We're working on fixing the GenericComm/GenericCommPromiscuous issue. We'll probably try to solve this particular problem without introducing new language constructs, but we know that some simple form of inheritance would make some things run better.
-Sam On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:08:59PM -0700, Sarah R. Newman wrote: > I've seen some comments about GenericComm and > GenericCommPromiscuous being very similar. I like > the idea of inline modules that inherit the name and > the "scope" of the module that includes it, in order > to solve the problem of duplicated code. > > --Sarah > > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-users _______________________________________________ Tinyos-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-users
