A phone meeting of the TIPC working group was held on March 29, 2007.
 
Attendees:
Al Stephens (Wind River) -- meeting chair; Jon Maloy (Ericsson); Randy
MacLeod (Nortel); Dominic Herity (Red Plain); Lijun Chen (Nortel); Elmer
Horvath (Wind River)

Minutes:
 
1. Meeting opening.

The meeting was called to order at 11:02 AM (EDT).
 
2. Non-contiguous sk_buff support update.

Randy has provided a more complete patch for supporting sk_buffs
containing more than one fragment; Al will reivew this & provide
additional feedback.

Randy also suggested it would be a good idea to look at adding "all
round" support for fragmented sk_buffs, in addition to his current
receive path work.  Giving the send path the ability to create sk_buffs
using multiple smaller-sized fragments might result in better memory
utilization, and lessen the burden on the operating system to provide
large chunks of contiguous memory.  Al will add this to the TIPC
wish-list.

3. Hierarchical TIPC design update.

The design issues identified by Al at the last meeting were discussed
the following week by Al, Jon, Maarten Koning, Elmer, and Aldo
MacFarlane, and an action plan was created.

Al has subsequently implemented some of the changes discussed,
including:
- increasing the # of Ethernet bearers support by TIPC from 2 to 8,
- separating routing table functionality from name table functionality
(reusing code where possible to reduce duplication),
- introducing a new "route distribution" message type, and
- optimizing the purging of unreachable name table entries and severing
broken connections when connectivity with a node (or cluster, or zone)
is lost.

Along the way, Al has created a lot of the infrastructure needed to
support the addition of "network scope" service naming, in addition to
the existing node, cluster, and zone scopes.

The major item not yet addressed is the addition of routable links (aka
"linklets"), which are needed to improve the performance and reliability
of messages sent between clusters or zones.  Al will probably not begin
this work for a month or two, as he needs to stabilize the upcoming TIPC
1.7.3 software for release in mid-May.

Jon and Al then discussed some ideas involving the separation of logical
Link functionality from physical Link (aka "Trunk") functionality.
Further discussion will be postponed until Al is ready to begin work in
this area.

4. Link stability question.

Dominic inquired about currently known issues involving link instability
(link flopping).  Randy and Jon replied that it shouldn't be an issue if
the link tolerance is not set too small, but no one has actually tested
this recently to see what the lower limit really is.

5. Performance update.

Elmer is coordinating activities in this area.  A new participant
(Florian) has offered to assist with this work; Hari (from OpenClovis)
will also be directed to this area.

6. Bond interface update.

Jon reported that he's still waiting on Ericsson management to approve
the release of the bond interface code Randy is interested in seeing.

7. redFOX announcement.

Dominic reported that he will be sending out an announcement about the
addition of TIPC support to the redFOX high performance distributed
object infrastructure.

8. Patch submission update.

Jon reported he is still working on the small patch Al recently supplied
for inclusion into the TIPC 1.6 stream.  The main source of the delay is
the updating required to Jon's development environment, which had not
been used in a long time.

9. Meeting close.

The meeting adjourned at 11:50 AM.  The next meeting is scheduled for
Thursday, April 26th at 11:00 AM EDT.
 
Please let me know of any errors or omissions.
 
Regards,
Al Stephens
 
[END]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to