On Jun 13, 2016 20:29, "Jon Maloy" <ma...@donjonn.com> wrote: > I already thought about that, and checked the implementation of > skb_dequeue(). As I suspected it unconditionally grabs the queue lock > before checking if there is anything to return. We don't want that on > the critical data path. >
What i suggested is no different than your patch from a queue locking point of view. Only the extra length check is removed. Did you perhaps intend to use __skb_dequeue()? //E ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
