Hi Partha,

I rebuilt afresh and retried the test with the same lockup kernel dumps.
Yes I have multiple tipc clients subscribed to the topology server, at
least 10 clients.
They all use a subscription timeout of TIPC_WAIT_FOREVER

I will try the kernel command line parameter next week.
JT


On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan <
parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Do you have several tipc clients subscribed to topology server?
> What subscription timeout do they use?
>
> Please enable kernel command line parameter:
> softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace=1
>
> /Partha
>
> On 11/23/2016 11:04 PM, John Thompson wrote:
>
>> Hi Partha,
>>
>> I tested overnight with the 2 patches you provided yesterday.
>> Testing is still showing problems, here is one of the soft lockups, the
>> other is the same as I sent the other day.
>> I am going to redo my build as I expected some change in behaviour with
>> your patches.
>>
>> It is possible that I am doing some dumping of nodes or links as I am
>> not certain of all the code or paths.
>> I have found that we do a tipc-config -nt and tipc-config -ls in some
>> situations but it shouldn 't be initiated in this
>> reboot case.
>>
>> <0>NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [pimd:1220]
>> <0>NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [rpc.13:2419]
>> <6>Modules linked in:
>> <0>NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [AIS
>> listener:1600]
>> <6> tipc
>> <6>Modules linked in:
>> <6> jitterentropy_rng
>> <6> tipc
>> <6> echainiv
>> <6> jitterentropy_rng
>> <6> drbg
>> <6> echainiv
>> <6> platform_driver(O)
>> <6> drbg
>> <6> platform_driver(O)
>> <6>
>> <6>CPU: 0 PID: 2419 Comm: rpc.13 Tainted: P           O
>> <6>CPU: 2 PID: 1600 Comm: AIS listener Tainted: P           O
>> <6>task: aed76d20 ti: ae70c000 task.ti: ae70c000
>> <6>task: aee3ced0 ti: ae686000 task.ti: ae686000
>> <6>NIP: 8069257c LR: c13ebc4c CTR: 80692540
>> <6>NIP: 80692578 LR: c13ebf50 CTR: 80692540
>> <6>REGS: ae70dc20 TRAP: 0901   Tainted: P           O
>> <6>REGS: ae687ad0 TRAP: 0901   Tainted: P           O
>> <6>MSR: 00029002
>> <6>MSR: 00029002
>> <6><
>> <6><
>> <6>CE
>> <6>CE
>> <6>,EE
>> <6>,EE
>> <6>,ME
>> <6>,ME
>> <6>>
>> <6>>
>> <6>  CR: 42002484  XER: 20000000
>> <6>  CR: 48002444  XER: 00000000
>> <6>
>> <6>GPR00:
>> <6>
>> <6>GPR00:
>> <6>c13f3c34
>> <6>c13ea408
>> <6>ae70dcd0
>> <6>ae687b80
>> <6>aed76d20
>> <6>aee3ced0
>> <6>ae55c8ec
>> <6>ae55c8ec
>> <6>00002711
>> <6>00000000
>> <6>00000005
>> <6>a30e7264
>> <6>8666592a
>> <6>ae5e070c
>> <6>8666592b
>> <6>fffffffd
>> <6>
>> <6>GPR08:
>> <6>
>> <6>GPR08:
>> <6>ae9dad20
>> <6>ae72fbc8
>> <6>00000001
>> <6>00000001
>> <6>00000001
>> <6>00000001
>> <6>00000000
>> <6>00000004
>> <6>80692540
>> <6>80692540
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>NIP [8069257c] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3c/0x70
>> <6>NIP [80692578] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x70
>> <6>LR [c13ebc4c] tipc_nametbl_withdraw+0x4c/0x140 [tipc]
>> <6>LR [c13ebf50] tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe+0x50/0x120 [tipc]
>> <6>Call Trace:
>> <6>Call Trace:
>> <6>[ae70dcd0] [a85d99a0] 0xa85d99a0
>> <6>[ae687b80] [800fa258] check_object+0xc8/0x270
>> <6> (unreliable)
>> <6> (unreliable)
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70dd00] [c13f3c34] tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x1904/0x45d0 [tipc]
>> <6>[ae687ba0] [c13ea408] tipc_named_reinit+0xf8/0x820 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70dd30] [c13f4848] tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x2518/0x45d0 [tipc]
>> <6>[ae687bb0] [c13ea6c0] tipc_named_reinit+0x3b0/0x820 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70dd70] [804f29e0] sock_release+0x30/0xf0
>> <6>[ae687bd0] [c13f7bbc] tipc_nl_publ_dump+0x50c/0xed0 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70dd80] [804f2ab4] sock_close+0x14/0x30
>> <6>[ae687c00] [c13f865c] tipc_conn_sendmsg+0xdc/0x170 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70dd90] [80105844] __fput+0x94/0x200
>> <6>[ae687c30] [c13eacbc] tipc_subscrp_report_overlap+0xbc/0xd0 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70ddb0] [8003dca4] task_work_run+0xd4/0x100
>> <6>[ae687c70] [c13eb27c] tipc_topsrv_stop+0x45c/0x4f0 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70ddd0] [80023620] do_exit+0x280/0x980
>> <6>[ae687ca0] [c13eb7a8] tipc_nametbl_remove_publ+0x58/0x110 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70de10] [80024c48] do_group_exit+0x48/0xb0
>> <6>[ae687cd0] [c13ebc68] tipc_nametbl_withdraw+0x68/0x140 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70de30] [80030344] get_signal+0x244/0x4f0
>> <6>[ae687d00] [c13f3c34] tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x1904/0x45d0 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70de80] [80007734] do_signal+0x34/0x1c0
>> <6>[ae687d30] [c13f4848] tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x2518/0x45d0 [tipc]
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70df30] [800079a8] do_notify_resume+0x68/0x80
>> <6>[ae687d70] [804f29e0] sock_release+0x30/0xf0
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70df40] [8000fa1c] do_user_signal+0x74/0xc4
>> <6>[ae687d80] [804f2ab4] sock_close+0x14/0x30
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>--- interrupt: c00 at 0xfe490c4
>> <6>    LR = 0xfe490a0
>> <6>[ae687d90] [80105844] __fput+0x94/0x200
>> <6>Instruction dump:
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae687db0] [8003dca4] task_work_run+0xd4/0x100
>> <6>912a0008
>> <6>
>> <6>39400001
>> <6>[ae687dd0] [80023620] do_exit+0x280/0x980
>> <6>7d201828
>> <6>
>> <6>2c090000
>> <6>[ae687e10] [80024c48] do_group_exit+0x48/0xb0
>> <6>40820010
>> <6>
>> <6>7d40192d
>> <6>[ae687e30] [80030344] get_signal+0x244/0x4f0
>> <6>40a2fff0
>> <6>
>> <6>7c2004ac
>> <6>[ae687e80] [80007734] do_signal+0x34/0x1c0
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>2f890000
>> <6>[ae687f30] [800079a8] do_notify_resume+0x68/0x80
>> <6>4dbe0020
>> <6>
>> <6>7c210b78
>> <6>[ae687f40] [8000fa1c] do_user_signal+0x74/0xc4
>> <6>81230000
>> <6>
>> <6><2f890000>
>> <6>--- interrupt: c00 at 0xf4f3d08
>> <6>    LR = 0xf4f3ce8
>> <6>40befff4
>> <6>Instruction dump:
>> <6>7c421378
>> <6>
>> <6>7d201828
>> <6>39290200
>> <6>
>> <6>912a0008 39400001
>> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
>> <6>7d201828
>> <6>CPU: 0 PID: 2419 Comm: rpc.13 Tainted: P           O L
>> <6>2c090000
>> <6>Call Trace:
>> <6>40820010
>> <6>[ae70da80] [80694e20] dump_stack+0x84/0xb0
>> <6>7d40192d
>> <6> (unreliable)
>> <6>40a2fff0
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70da90] [80692ca8] panic+0xd8/0x214
>> <6>7c2004ac
>> <6>
>> <6>2f890000
>> <6>[ae70daf0] [800a0258] watchdog_timer_fn+0x2d8/0x2e0
>> <6>4dbe0020
>> <6>
>> <6>7c210b78
>> <6>[ae70db40] [8007ae58] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x118/0x1d0
>> <6><81230000>
>> <6>
>> <6>2f890000
>> <6>[ae70db80] [8007b608] hrtimer_interrupt+0xd8/0x270
>> <6>40befff4
>> <6>
>> <6>7c421378
>> <6>[ae70dbd0] [8000983c] __timer_interrupt+0xac/0x1b0
>> <6>
>> <6>
>> <6>[ae70dbf0] [80009b70] timer_interrupt+0xb0/0xe0
>> <6>[ae70dc10] [8000f450] ret_from_except+0x0/0x18
>> <6>--- interrupt: 901 at _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3c/0x70
>> <6>    LR = tipc_nametbl_withdraw+0x4c/0x140 [tipc]
>> <6>[ae70dcd0] [a85d99a0] 0xa85d99a0 (unreliable)
>> <6>[ae70dd00] [c13f3c34] tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x1904/0x45d0 [tipc]
>> <6>[ae70dd30] [c13f4848] tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x2518/0x45d0 [tipc]
>> <6>[ae70dd70] [804f29e0] sock_release+0x30/0xf0
>> <6>[ae70dd80] [804f2ab4] sock_close+0x14/0x30
>> <6>[ae70dd90] [80105844] __fput+0x94/0x200
>> <6>[ae70ddb0] [8003dca4] task_work_run+0xd4/0x100
>> <6>[ae70ddd0] [80023620] do_exit+0x280/0x980
>> <6>[ae70de10] [80024c48] do_group_exit+0x48/0xb0
>> <6>[ae70de30] [80030344] get_signal+0x244/0x4f0
>> <6>[ae70de80] [80007734] do_signal+0x34/0x1c0
>> <6>[ae70df30] [800079a8] do_notify_resume+0x68/0x80
>> <6>[ae70df40] [8000fa1c] do_user_signal+0x74/0xc4
>> <6>--- interrupt: c00 at 0xfe490c4
>> <6>    LR = 0xfe490a0
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
>> <parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com
>> <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi John,
>>
>>     Ok. Can you test with the 2 patches I posted regarding the
>> nametbl_lock?
>>
>>     /Partha
>>
>>     On 11/21/2016 11:32 PM, John Thompson wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Partha,
>>
>>         My test has 4 nodes, 2 of which are alternately rebooting.  When
>> the
>>         rebooted node rejoins a few minutes pass and then the other node
>> is
>>         rebooted.
>>         I am not printing out link stats and believe that the the other
>>         code is
>>         not doing so either, when nodes leave or rejoin.
>>
>>         JT
>>
>>
>>         On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
>>         <parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com
>>         <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com>
>>         <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com
>>         <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi,
>>
>>             There is an other branch where softlockup for nametbl_lock
>>         occurs.
>>
>>             tipc_named_rcv() Grabs nametbl_lock
>>               tipc_update_nametbl() (publish/withdraw)
>>                 tipc_node_subscribe()/unsubscribe()
>>                   tipc_node_write_unlock()
>>                      << lockup occurs if it needs to process NODE
>>         UP/DOWN LINK
>>             UP/DOWN, as it grabs nametbl_lock again >>
>>
>>             /Partha
>>
>>
>>             On 11/21/2016 01:04 PM, Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan wrote:
>>
>>                 Hi,
>>
>>                 tipc_nametbl_withdraw() triggers the softlockup as it
>>         tries to grab
>>                 nametbl_lock twice if the node triggered a
>>         TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_DOWN
>>                 event
>>                 while its is running. The erroneous call chain is:
>>
>>                   tipc_nametbl_withdraw() Grab nametbl_lock
>>                     tipc_named_process_backlog()
>>                       tipc_update_nametbl()
>>                         if (dtype == WITHDRAWAL) tipc_node_unsubscribe()
>>                           tipc_node_write_unlock()
>>                             if (flags & TIPC_NOTIFY_LINK_DOWN)
>>                 tipc_nametbl_withdraw()
>>                                spin_lock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);  << Soft
>>         Lockup >>
>>
>>                 Three callers which can cause this under module exit:
>>
>>                 Case1:
>>                   tipc_exit_net()
>>                     tipc_nametbl_withdraw() Grab nametbl_lock
>>
>>                 Case2:
>>                   tipc_server_stop()
>>                     tipc_conn_kref_release
>>                       tipc_sock_release
>>                         sock_release()
>>                           tipc_release()
>>                             tipc_sk_withdraw()
>>                               tipc_nametbl_withdraw()
>>
>>                 Case3:
>>                   tipc_server_stop()
>>                     tipc_conn_kref_release()
>>                       kernel_bind()
>>                         tipc_bind()
>>                           tipc_sk_withdraw()
>>                             tipc_nametbl_withdraw()
>>
>>                 I will work on a solution for this.
>>
>>                 What kind of test were you performing when this occurred
>>                 (linkup/down)?
>>                 Do you read link statistics periodically in your tests?
>>
>>                 /Partha
>>
>>                 On 11/21/2016 05:30 AM, John Thompson wrote:
>>
>>                     Hi Partha,
>>
>>                     I was doing some some more testing today and have
>> still
>>                     observed the
>>                     problem (contrary to what I had emailed earlier).
>>
>>                     Here is the kernel dump.
>>
>>                     <0>NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for
>> 22s!
>>                     [Pluggable
>>                     Serve:2221]
>>                     <6>Modules linked in: tipc jitterentropy_rng
>>         echainiv drbg
>>                     platform_driver(O)
>>                     <6>CPU: 0 PID: 2221 Comm: Pluggable Serve Tainted:
>>         P           O
>>                     <6>task: ae54ced0 ti: aec42000 task.ti: aec42000
>>                     <6>NIP: 8069257c LR: c13ebf50 CTR: 80692540
>>                     <6>REGS: aec43ad0 TRAP: 0901   Tainted: P           O
>>                     <6>MSR: 00029002 <CE,EE,ME>  CR: 48002444  XER:
>> 00000000
>>                     <6>
>>                     <6>GPR00: c13ea408 aec43b80 ae54ced0 a624690c 00000000
>>                     a6271d84 a39a60cc
>>                     fffffffd
>>                     <6>GPR08: aeefbbc8 00000001 00000001 00000004 80692540
>>                     <6>NIP [8069257c] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3c/0x70
>>                     <6>LR [c13ebf50] tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe+0x50/0x120
>>         [tipc]
>>                     <6>Call Trace:
>>                     <6>[aec43b80] [800fa258] check_object+0xc8/0x270
>>         (unreliable)
>>                     <6>[aec43ba0] [c13ea408]
>>         tipc_named_reinit+0xf8/0x820 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43bb0] [c13ea6c0]
>>         tipc_named_reinit+0x3b0/0x820 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43bd0] [c13f7bbc]
>>         tipc_nl_publ_dump+0x50c/0xed0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43c00] [c13f865c]
>>         tipc_conn_sendmsg+0xdc/0x170 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43c30] [c13eacbc]
>>                     tipc_subscrp_report_overlap+0xbc/0xd0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43c70] [c13eb27c]
>>         tipc_topsrv_stop+0x45c/0x4f0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43ca0] [c13eb7a8]
>>         tipc_nametbl_remove_publ+0x58/0x110
>>                     [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43cd0] [c13ebc68]
>>         tipc_nametbl_withdraw+0x68/0x140 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43d00] [c13f3c34]
>>                     tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x1904/0x45d0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43d30] [c13f4848]
>>                     tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x2518/0x45d0 [tipc]
>>
>>                 TIPC_CMD_SHOW_LINK_STATS or TIPC_NL_LINK_GET
>>
>>                     <6>[aec43d70] [804f29e0] sock_release+0x30/0xf0
>>                     <6>[aec43d80] [804f2ab4] sock_close+0x14/0x30
>>                     <6>[aec43d90] [80105844] __fput+0x94/0x200
>>                     <6>[aec43db0] [8003dca4] task_work_run+0xd4/0x100
>>                     <6>[aec43dd0] [80023620] do_exit+0x280/0x980
>>                     <6>[aec43e10] [80024c48] do_group_exit+0x48/0xb0
>>                     <6>[aec43e30] [80030344] get_signal+0x244/0x4f0
>>                     <6>[aec43e80] [80007734] do_signal+0x34/0x1c0
>>                     <6>[aec43f30] [800079a8] do_notify_resume+0x68/0x80
>>                     <6>[aec43f40] [8000fa1c] do_user_signal+0x74/0xc4
>>                     <6>--- interrupt: c00 at 0xf4f3d08
>>                     <6>    LR = 0xf4f3ce8
>>                     <6>Instruction dump:
>>                     <6>912a0008 39400001 7d201828 2c090000 40820010
>> 7d40192d
>>                     40a2fff0 7c2004ac
>>                     <6>2f890000 4dbe0020 7c210b78 81230000 <2f890000>
>>         40befff4
>>                     7c421378
>>                     7d201828
>>                     <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
>>                     <6>CPU: 0 PID: 2221 Comm: Pluggable Serve Tainted: P
>>                        O L
>>                     <6>Call Trace:
>>                     <6>[aec43930] [80694e20] dump_stack+0x84/0xb0
>>         (unreliable)
>>                     <6>[aec43940] [80692ca8] panic+0xd8/0x214
>>                     <6>[aec439a0] [800a0258] watchdog_timer_fn+0x2d8/0x2e0
>>                     <6>[aec439f0] [8007ae58]
>>         __hrtimer_run_queues+0x118/0x1d0
>>                     <6>[aec43a30] [8007b608] hrtimer_interrupt+0xd8/0x270
>>                     <6>[aec43a80] [8000983c] __timer_interrupt+0xac/0x1b0
>>                     <6>[aec43aa0] [80009b70] timer_interrupt+0xb0/0xe0
>>                     <6>[aec43ac0] [8000f450] ret_from_except+0x0/0x18
>>                     <6>--- interrupt: 901 at _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3c/0x70
>>                     <6>    LR = tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe+0x50/0x120
>> [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43b80] [800fa258] check_object+0xc8/0x270
>>         (unreliable)
>>                     <6>[aec43ba0] [c13ea408]
>>         tipc_named_reinit+0xf8/0x820 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43bb0] [c13ea6c0]
>>         tipc_named_reinit+0x3b0/0x820 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43bd0] [c13f7bbc]
>>         tipc_nl_publ_dump+0x50c/0xed0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43c00] [c13f865c]
>>         tipc_conn_sendmsg+0xdc/0x170 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43c30] [c13eacbc]
>>                     tipc_subscrp_report_overlap+0xbc/0xd0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43c70] [c13eb27c]
>>         tipc_topsrv_stop+0x45c/0x4f0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43ca0] [c13eb7a8]
>>         tipc_nametbl_remove_publ+0x58/0x110
>>                     [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43cd0] [c13ebc68]
>>         tipc_nametbl_withdraw+0x68/0x140 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43d00] [c13f3c34]
>>                     tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x1904/0x45d0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43d30] [c13f4848]
>>                     tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x2518/0x45d0 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[aec43d70] [804f29e0] sock_release+0x30/0xf0
>>                     <6>[aec43d80] [804f2ab4] sock_close+0x14/0x30
>>                     <6>[aec43d90] [80105844] __fput+0x94/0x200
>>                     <6>[aec43db0] [8003dca4] task_work_run+0xd4/0x100
>>                     <6>[aec43dd0] [80023620] do_exit+0x280/0x980
>>                     <6>[aec43e10] [80024c48] do_group_exit+0x48/0xb0
>>                     <6>[aec43e30] [80030344] get_signal+0x244/0x4f0
>>                     <6>[aec43e80] [80007734] do_signal+0x34/0x1c0
>>                     <6>[aec43f30] [800079a8] do_notify_resume+0x68/0x80
>>                     <6>[aec43f40] [8000fa1c] do_user_signal+0x74/0xc4
>>                     <6>--- interrupt: c00 at 0xf4f3d08
>>                     <6>    LR = 0xf4f3ce8
>>
>>
>>                     On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, John Thompson
>>                     <thompa....@gmail.com <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com>
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com>>
>>                     <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com> <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com>>>>
>>                     wrote:
>>
>>                         Hi Partha,
>>
>>                         In my testing over the weekend the patch
>>         performed well
>>                     - I didn't
>>                         see any kernel dumps due to this issue.
>>
>>                         Thanks for the quick response.
>>                         JT
>>
>>
>>                         On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:34 AM, John Thompson
>>                         <thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com> <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com>>
>>                     <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com> <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com>>>>
>>                     wrote:
>>
>>                             Hi,
>>
>>                             I will be able to have some test results by
>> the
>>                     start of next
>>                             week on the first patch.
>>
>>                             Regards,
>>                             JT
>>
>>
>>                             On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Ying Xue
>>                             <ying....@windriver.com
>>         <mailto:ying....@windriver.com>
>>                     <mailto:ying....@windriver.com
>>         <mailto:ying....@windriver.com>>
>>                     <mailto:ying....@windriver.com
>>         <mailto:ying....@windriver.com>
>>                     <mailto:ying....@windriver.com
>>         <mailto:ying....@windriver.com>>>> wrote:
>>
>>                                 On 11/17/2016 07:04 AM, John Thompson
>> wrote:
>>
>>                                     Hi Partha / Ying,
>>
>>                                     I will try out the patch and let you
>>         know
>>                     how it goes.
>>                                     I also note about providing the
>>         other CPU
>>                     core dumps -
>>                                     in one of my cases I
>>                                     didn't have them but in others I did
>> but
>>                                     they were interleaved and so were
>>         difficult
>>                     to interpret.
>>
>>
>>                                 Thanks, it's unnecessary for us to
>>         collect more
>>                     logs as its
>>                                 soft lockup scenario should be just what
>>         Partha
>>                     described.
>>
>>                                 Regards,
>>                                 Ying
>>
>>
>>
>>                                     Thanks for getting a patch together
>>         so quickly.
>>
>>                                     JT
>>
>>                                     On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:23 PM,
>>                     Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan <
>>
>>         parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com
>>         <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com>
>>                     <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com
>>         <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com>>
>>
>>                     <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com
>>         <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com>
>>
>>                     <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com
>>         <mailto:parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com>>>> wrote:
>>
>>                                         Hi Ying / John,
>>
>>                                         The soft lock is the call chain of
>>                                         tipc_nametbl_withdraw(), when it
>>                                         performs the
>>         tipc_conn_kref_release() as
>>                     it tries to
>>                                         grab nametbl_lock
>>                                         again while holding it already.
>>
>>                                             tipc_nametbl_withdraw
>>
>>         spin_lock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);
>>                                               tipc_nametbl_remove_publ
>>                                                  spin_lock_bh(&seq->lock);
>>                                                  tipc_nameseq_remove_publ
>>
>>          tipc_subscrp_report_overlap
>>
>>  tipc_subscrp_send_event
>>                                                         tipc_conn_sendmsg
>>
>>                                         << Here, the
>> (test_bit(CF_CONNECTED,
>>                     &con->flags))
>>                                         Fails, leading to the
>>                                         else case where do do a
>>         conn_put() and
>>                     that triggers
>>                                         the cleanup as
>>                                         refcount reached 0. Leading the
>> call
>>                     chain below : >>
>>                                         tipc_conn_kref_release
>>                                            tipc_sock_release
>>                                              tipc_conn_release
>>                                                 tipc_subscrb_delete
>>                                                    tipc_subscrp_delete
>>
>>         tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe
>>
>>                      spin_lock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);
>>                                         << !! Soft Lockup >>
>>
>>                                         One cause is that
>>         tipc_exit_net() calls
>>                     first calls
>>                                         tipc_topsrv_stop() and
>>                                         then tipc_nametbl_withdraw() in
>>         scope of
>>                                         tipc_net_stop().
>>
>>                                         The above chain will only occur
>> in a
>>                     narrow window
>>                                         for a given connection:
>>                                         CPU#1:
>>                                         tipc_nametbl_withdraw() manages
>>         to perform
>>                                         tipc_conn_lookup() and steps
>>                                         the refcount to 2, while in
>>         CPU#2 the
>>                     following occurs:
>>                                         CPU#2:
>>                                         tipc_server_stop() calls
>>                     tipc_close_conn(con). This
>>                                         performs a conn_put()
>>                                         decrementing refcount to 1.
>>                                         Now, CPU#1 continues and detects
>>         that
>>                     the connection
>>                                         is not CF_CONNECTED
>>                                         and does a conn_put(),
>>         triggering the
>>                     release callback.
>>
>>                                         Before commit 333f796235a527,
>>         the above
>>                     wont happen.
>>
>>                                         /Partha
>>
>>
>>                                         On 11/15/2016 04:11 PM, Xue,
>>         Ying wrote:
>>
>>                                             Hi John,
>>
>>                                             Regarding the stack trace you
>>                     provided below, I
>>                                             get the two potential
>>                                             call chains:
>>
>>                                             tipc_nametbl_withdraw
>>
>>         spin_lock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);
>>                                               tipc_nametbl_remove_publ
>>                                                  spin_lock_bh(&seq->lock);
>>                                                  tipc_nameseq_remove_publ
>>
>>          tipc_subscrp_report_overlap
>>
>>  tipc_subscrp_send_event
>>                                                         tipc_conn_sendmsg
>>
>>                      spin_lock_bh(&con->outqueue_lock);
>>
>>          list_add_tail(&e->list,
>>                                             &con->outqueue);
>>
>>
>>                                             tipc_topsrv_stop
>>                                               tipc_server_stop
>>                                                 tipc_close_conn
>>                                                   kernel_sock_shutdown
>>                                                     tipc_subscrb_delete
>>
>>                     spin_lock_bh(&subscriber->lock);
>>
>>         tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe(sub);
>>
>>                      spin_lock_bh(&tn->nametbl_lock);
>>
>>                                             Although I suspect this is a
>>         revert
>>                     lock issue
>>                                             leading to the soft
>>                                             lockup, I am still unable to
>>                     understand which
>>                                             lock together with
>>                                             nametbl_lock is taken
>>         reversely on
>>                     the two
>>                                             different paths above.
>>                                             However, you just gave us
>>         the log
>>                     printed on
>>                                             CPU#2, but the logs
>>                                             outputted by other cores are
>>         also
>>                     important.  So
>>                                             if possible, please share
>>                                             them with us.
>>
>>                                             By the way, I agree with
>>         you, and it
>>                     seems that
>>                                             commit 333f796235a527 is
>>                                             related to the soft lockup.
>>
>>                                             Regards,
>>                                             Ying
>>
>>                                             -----Original Message-----
>>                                             From: John Thompson
>>                     [mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com> <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com>>
>>                                             <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com>
>>                     <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:thompa....@gmail.com>>>]
>>                                             Sent: Tuesday, November 15,
>>         2016 8:01 AM
>>                                             To:
>>                     tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>>
>>                                             Subject: [tipc-discussion]
>> v4.7:
>>                     soft lockup
>>                                             when releasing a socket
>>
>>                                             Hi,
>>
>>                                             I am seeing an occasional
>> kernel
>>                     soft lockup.  I
>>                                             have TIPC v4.7 and the
>>                                             kernel dump occurs when the
>>         system
>>                     is going down
>>                                             for a reboot.
>>
>>                                             The kernel dump is:
>>
>>                                             <0>NMI watchdog: BUG: soft
>>         lockup -
>>                     CPU#2 stuck
>>                                             for 23s! [exfx:1474]
>>                                             <6>Modules linked in: tipc
>>                     jitterentropy_rng
>>                                             echainiv drbg
>>                                             platform_driver(O) ipifwd(PO)
>>                                             ...
>>                                             <6>
>>                                             <6>GPR00: c15333e8 a4e0fb80
>>         a4ee3600
>>                     a51748ac
>>                                             00000000 ae475024 a537feec
>>                                             fffffffd
>>                                             <6>GPR08: a2197408 00000001
>>         00000001
>>                     00000004
>>                                             80691c00 <6>NIP [80691c40]
>>                                             _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x40/0x70
>>         <6>LR
>>                     [c1534f30]
>>
>>         tipc_nametbl_unsubscribe+0x50/0x120
>>                                             [tipc] <6>Call Trace:
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fba0] [c15333e8]
>>                                             tipc_named_reinit+0xf8/0x820
>>         [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fbb0] [c15336a0]
>>
>>         tipc_named_reinit+0x3b0/0x820 [tipc]
>>                     <6>[a4e0fbd0]
>>                                             [c1540bac]
>>                     tipc_nl_publ_dump+0x50c/0xed0 [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fc00] [c154164c]
>>                                             tipc_conn_sendmsg+0xdc/0x170
>>         [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fc30] [c1533c9c]
>>
>>                     tipc_subscrp_report_overlap+0xbc/0xd0 [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fc70] [c153425c]
>>                                             tipc_topsrv_stop+0x45c/0x4f0
>>         [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fca0] [c1534788]
>>
>>         tipc_nametbl_remove_publ+0x58/0x110
>>                     [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fcd0] [c1534c48]
>>
>>         tipc_nametbl_withdraw+0x68/0x140 [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fd00] [c153cc24]
>>
>>         tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x1904/0x45d0
>>                     [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fd30] [c153d838]
>>
>>         tipc_nl_node_dump_link+0x2518/0x45d0
>>                     [tipc]
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fd70] [804f2870]
>>                                             sock_release+0x30/0xf0
>>         <6>[a4e0fd80]
>>                     [804f2944]
>>                                             sock_close+0x14/0x30
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fd90] [80105844]
>>                     __fput+0x94/0x200
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fdb0] [8003dca4]
>>                                             task_work_run+0xd4/0x100
>>         <6>[a4e0fdd0]
>>                                             [80023620] do_exit+0x280/0x980
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fe10] [80024c48]
>>                     do_group_exit+0x48/0xb0
>>                                             <6>[a4e0fe30] [80030344]
>>                                             get_signal+0x244/0x4f0
>>         <6>[a4e0fe80]
>>                     [80007734]
>>                                             do_signal+0x34/0x1c0
>>                                             <6>[a4e0ff30] [800079a8]
>>                                             do_notify_resume+0x68/0x80
>>         <6>[a4e0ff40]
>>                                             [8000fa1c]
>>         do_user_signal+0x74/0xc4
>>
>>
>>                                             From the stack dump it looks
>>         like
>>                                             tipc_named_reinit is trying to
>>
>>
>>                                             acquire nametbl_lock.
>>
>>                                             From looking at the call
>>         chain I can
>>                     see that
>>                                             tipc_conn_sendmsg can
>>
>>
>>                                             send up calling conn_put
>>
>>                                             which will go on and call the
>>                     tipc_named_reinit
>>                                             via tipc_sock_release.
>>
>>                                             As tipc_nametbl_withdraw
>>         (from the
>>                     stack dump)
>>                                             has already acquired the
>>                                             nametbl_lock,
>> tipc_named_reinit
>>
>>                                             cannot get it and so the
>>         process hangs.
>>
>>
>>                                             The call to
>>         tipc_sock_release (added
>>                     in Commit
>>                                             333f796235a527
>>
>>
>>         <http://git.atlnz.lc/cgit/cgit.cgi/upstream_imports/linux-
>>         <http://git.atlnz.lc/cgit/cgit.cgi/upstream_imports/linux->
>>
>>         <http://git.atlnz.lc/cgit/cgit.cgi/upstream_imports/linux-
>>         <http://git.atlnz.lc/cgit/cgit.cgi/upstream_imports/linux->>
>>
>>
>>         <http://git.atlnz.lc/cgit/cgit.cgi/upstream_imports/linux-
>>         <http://git.atlnz.lc/cgit/cgit.cgi/upstream_imports/linux->
>>
>>         <http://git.atlnz.lc/cgit/cgit.cgi/upstream_imports/linux-
>>         <http://git.atlnz.lc/cgit/cgit.cgi/upstream_imports/linux->>>
>>
>>
>>         stable.git/commit/?id=333f796235a52727db7e0a13888045f3aa3d5335>)
>>                                             seems to have changed the
>>         behaviour
>>
>>                                             such that it tries to do a
>>         lot more when
>>                                             shutting the connection down.
>>
>>
>>                                             If there is other
>>         information I can
>>                     provide
>>                                             please let me know.
>>
>>                                             Regards,
>>
>>                                             John
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------
>>                                             ------------------
>>
>>                     _______________________________________________
>>                                             tipc-discussion mailing list
>>
>>                     tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>>
>>
>>
>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>
>>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>>
>>
>>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>>>
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------
>>                                             ------------------
>>
>>                     _______________________________________________
>>                                             tipc-discussion mailing list
>>
>>                     tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>>
>>
>>
>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>
>>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>>
>>
>>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>                                     tipc-discussion mailing list
>>
>>         tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                     <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>>
>>
>>
>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>
>>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>>
>>
>>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 tipc-discussion mailing list
>>                 tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                 <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>>
>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>
>>
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to