>> >> For UDP bearer, it seems insufficient for us to check MTU size only >> when UDP bearer is enabled. Meanwhile, we should update MTU size for >> UDP bearer with Path MTU discovery protocol once MTU size is changed >> after bearer is enabled. > > I should admit I'm not that familiar with tipc. Do you mean updating > b->mtu in response to PMTU updates of the route used for ub->ubsock?
Yes. > The way I understand it, it would be certainly useful but it's not > directly related to the security issue this patch addresses as if there > are no updates, b->mtu cannot get too low and there is no risk of > a buffer overflow. In other words, reflecting PMTU updates is something > that can be IMHO left for later. > Agreed. Regards, Ying > Michal Kubecek > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
