From: Jon Maloy <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:35:08 +0000
> > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of David Miller >> Sent: Monday, 16 January, 2017 14:45 >> To: Jon Maloy <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan >> <[email protected]>; Ying Xue >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; tipc- >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link >> >> From: Jon Maloy <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:26:45 -0500 >> >> > We fix a very real starvation problem that may occur when a link >> > encounters send buffer congestion. At the same time we make the >> > interaction between the socket and link layer simpler and more >> > consistent. >> >> This doesn't apply to net-next, also the Date in your emails is 10 days >> in the past. What's going on here? > > I don't know. This series was sent in on Jan 3rd, and applied by you the same > day. Maybe the mail server decided to send you a duplicate? If you look in the headers, they have "Received-by: " fields with January 13th in the date. So something pushed them out again. Really strange... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
