On 02/24/2017 10:50 PM, Jon Maloy wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan >> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 08:51 AM >> To: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; Jon Maloy >> <jon.ma...@ericsson.com>; Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com>; >> pbut...@sonusnet.com >> Subject: [PATCH net v1 1/2] tipc: fix socket flow control errors >> >> In this commit, we fix the following two errors: >> 1. In tipc_send_stream(), fix the return value during congestion >> when the send is partially successful. Until now, we return -1 >> instead of returning the partial sent bytes. >> 2. In tipc_recv_stream(), we update the rcv_unack not based on the >> message size, but on sz. Usually they are the same, but in cases >> where the socket receivers buffer is smaller than the incoming >> message, these two parameters differ greatly. > I was first confused by this, but I assume you with 'socket receive buffer' > in this case mean the read buffer given by the user when he does read(), not > sk->sk_rcvbuf as I first thought
Yes, I have the same impression at a glance. Please slight revise the description. Thanks, Ying ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
