> -----Original Message----- > From: Xue, Ying <[email protected]> > Sent: 14-Oct-19 11:55 > To: Jon Maloy <[email protected]>; Xin Long <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [net-next] tipc: improve throughput between nodes in netns > > Hi Jon, > > Please see my comment inline. > > At netdev 0x13 in Prague last July there was presented a related proposal > https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=aef37301-f27aa946-aef3339a- > 0cc47ad93c18- > 1e8b56dd88647abb&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fnetdevconf.info%2F0x13%2 > Fsession.html%3Ftalk-AF_GRAFT. > I was there, and I cannot say there was any overwhelming approval of this > proposal, but neither was it rejected out of hand. > > [Ying] The idea of AF_GRAFT socket is exactly the same as this patch. If it > can > be recognized, it's definitely worth trying to submit this patch to upstream. > But > after my checking, the wired thing is that AF_GRAFT is not supported by latest > kernel and I don't find its author ever attempted to submit its patch to > upstream. > > First, I see TIPC as an IPC, not a network protocol, and anybody using TIPC > inside a cluster has per definition been authenticated to start a node and > connect to the cluster. Here, there is no change from current policies. > Once a node has been accepted in a cluster, possibly via encrypted discovery > messages which have been passing all policies checks, and we are 100% > certain it is legitimate and located in the same kernel (as we are trying to > ensure in this patch), I cannot see any reason why we should not be allowed to > short-cut the stack the way we do. Security checks have already been done. > Are we circumventing any other policies by doing this that must not be done? > > [Ying] If we treat TIPC as IPC channel, bypassing its lower level interface is > acceptable. Beside AF_GRAFT socket, in fact AF_UNIX socket provides an > interconnection mechanism between different processes on socket level, and > there are several options available for us to configure policies against > socket, > such as, SO_ATTACH_FILTER, SO_ATTACH_BPF, > SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_EBPF etc. If we bypass TIPC bearer, the most > inconvenient thing is that it's hard for us to monitor traffics between netns > with tcpdump. You must have forgot that since commit 6c9081a3915d ("add loopback device tracing") this is no problem any more. Of course we do the same in this case, so a trouble shooter only needs to do tcpdump on the sender's loopback interface. ///jon Of course, as Xin mentioned previously, we could not use > traditional tools to control/shape TIPC traffic across netns. > > Unless you strongly object I would suggest we send this to netdev as an RFC > and observe the reactions. If David or Eric or any of the other heavyweight > say > flatly no there is nothing we can do. But It might be worth a try. > > [Ying] No, I don't strongly object this proposal. We can try to submit it to > net- > next mail list. > > Thanks, > Ying > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Xue, Ying <[email protected]> > > Sent: 11-Oct-19 07:58 > > To: Jon Maloy <[email protected]>; Xin Long <[email protected]> > > Subject: RE: [net-next] tipc: improve throughput between nodes in > > netns > > > > Exactly. I agree with Xin. The major purpose of namespace is mainly to > > provide an isolated environment. But as this patch almost completely > > bypasses security check points of networking stack, the traffics > > between namespaces will be out of control. So I don't think this is a good > idea. > > > > Thanks, > > Ying > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jon Maloy [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 2:14 AM > > To: Xin Long > > Cc: Xue, Ying > > Subject: RE: [net-next] tipc: improve throughput between nodes in > > netns > > > > Hi Xin, > > I am not surprised by you answer. Apart from concerns about security, > > this is the same objection I have heard from others when presenting > > this idea, and I suspect that this would also be the reaction if we try to > deliver this to David. > > If we can achieve anything close to this by adding GSO to the veth > > interface I think that would be a safer approach. > > So, I suggest we put this one to rest for now, and I'll try to go > > ahead with the GSO approach instead. > > > > Sorry Hoang for making you waste your time. > > > > BR > > ///jon > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Xin Long <[email protected]> > > > Sent: 10-Oct-19 07:14 > > > To: Jon Maloy <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Ying Xue <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [net-next] tipc: improve throughput between nodes in > > > netns > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > Ying and Xin, > > > > This is the "wormhole" functionality I have been suggesting a > > > > since while back. > > > > Basically, we send messages directly socket to socket between name > > > > spaces on the same host, not only between sockets within the same > > > > name > > > space. > > > > As you will understand this might have a huge positive impact on > > > > performance between e.g., docker containers or containers inside > > > Kubernetes pods. > > > > > > > > Please spend some time reviewing this, as it might be a > > > > controversial feature. It is imperative that we get security right here. > > > > > > > If I understand it right: > > > > > > With this patch, TIPC packets will skip all lower layers protocol > > > stack, like IP (udp media), ether link layer, which means all rules > > > of like tc, ovs, netfiler/br_netfilter will be skipped. > > > > > > I don't think this could be endured, especially when it comes to a > > > cloud environment where many rules are configured on those virtual > > > NICs. Unless we have some special needs, I'm not sure if this > > > performance improvement is worth a big protocol stack skip. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > BR > > > > ///jon > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Hoang Le <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: 2-Oct-19 06:26 > > > > To: Jon Maloy <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > > > [email protected] > > > > Subject: [net-next] tipc: improve throughput between nodes in > > > > netns > > > > > > > > Introduce traffic cross namespaces transmission as local node. > > > > By this way, throughput between nodes in namespace as fast as local. > > > > > > > > Testcase: > > > > $ip netns exec 1 benchmark_client -c 100 $ip netns exec 2 > > > > benchmark_server > > > > > > > > Before: > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | Msg Size | # | # Msgs/ | Elapsed | > > > > Throughput > > > > | | > > > > | [octets] | Conns | Conn | [ms] > > > > | +------------------------------------------------+ > > > > | | | | | Total [Msg/s] | Total > > > > [Mb/s] | > > > > | | | | | Per Conn [Mb/s] | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 64 | 100 | 64000 | 13005 | 492103 | > > > > 251 | > > > > | 2 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 256 | 100 | 32000 | 4964 | 644627 | > > > > 1320 | > > > > | 13 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 1024 | 100 | 16000 | 4524 | 353612 | > > > > 2896 | > > > > | 28 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 4096 | 100 | 8000 | 3675 | 217644 | > > > > 7131 | > > > > | 71 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 16384 | 100 | 4000 | 7914 | 50540 | > > > > 6624 | > > > > | 66 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 65536 | 100 | 2000 | 13000 | 15384 | > > > > 8065 | > > > > | 80 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > > > > > After: > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | Msg Size | # | # Msgs/ | Elapsed | > > > > Throughput > > > > | | > > > > | [octets] | Conns | Conn | [ms] > > > > | +------------------------------------------------+ > > > > | | | | | Total [Msg/s] | Total > > > > [Mb/s] | > > > > | | | | | Per Conn [Mb/s] | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 64 | 100 | 64000 | 7842 | 816090 | > > > > 417 | > > > > | 4 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 256 | 100 | 32000 | 3593 | 890469 | > > > > 1823 | > > > > | 18 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 1024 | 100 | 16000 | 1835 | 871828 | > > > > 7142 | > > > > | 71 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 4096 | 100 | 8000 | 1134 | 704904 | > > > > 23098 | > > > > | 230 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 16384 | 100 | 4000 | 878 | 455295 | > > > > 59676 | > > > > | 596 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > | 65536 | 100 | 2000 | 1007 | 198487 | > > > > 104064 | > > > > | 1040 | > > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +---------------------------- > > + > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hoang Le <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > net/tipc/discover.c | 6 ++- > > > > net/tipc/msg.h | 10 +++++ > > > > net/tipc/name_distr.c | 2 +- > > > > net/tipc/node.c | 94 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > net/tipc/node.h | 4 +- > > > > net/tipc/socket.c | 6 +-- > > > > 6 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/net/tipc/discover.c b/net/tipc/discover.c index > > > > c138d68e8a69..98d4eea97eb7 100644 > > > > --- a/net/tipc/discover.c > > > > +++ b/net/tipc/discover.c > > > > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ > > > > #include "node.h" > > > > #include "discover.h" > > > > > > > > +#include <net/netns/hash.h> > > > > + > > > > /* min delay during bearer start up */ > > > > #define TIPC_DISC_INIT msecs_to_jiffies(125) > > > > /* max delay if bearer has no links */ @@ -94,6 +96,7 @@ static > > > > void tipc_disc_init_msg(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, > > > > msg_set_dest_domain(hdr, dest_domain); > > > > msg_set_bc_netid(hdr, tn->net_id); > > > > b->media->addr2msg(msg_media_addr(hdr), &b->addr); > > > > + msg_set_peer_net_hash(hdr, net_hash_mix(net)); > > > > msg_set_node_id(hdr, tipc_own_id(net)); } > > > > > > > > @@ -200,6 +203,7 @@ void tipc_disc_rcv(struct net *net, struct > > > > sk_buff > > > *skb, > > > > u8 peer_id[NODE_ID_LEN] = {0,}; > > > > u32 dst = msg_dest_domain(hdr); > > > > u32 net_id = msg_bc_netid(hdr); > > > > + u32 pnet_hash = msg_peer_net_hash(hdr); > > > > struct tipc_media_addr maddr; > > > > u32 src = msg_prevnode(hdr); > > > > u32 mtyp = msg_type(hdr); > > > > @@ -242,7 +246,7 @@ void tipc_disc_rcv(struct net *net, struct > > > > sk_buff > > > *skb, > > > > if (!tipc_in_scope(legacy, b->domain, src)) > > > > return; > > > > tipc_node_check_dest(net, src, peer_id, b, caps, signature, > > > > - &maddr, &respond, &dupl_addr); > > > > + pnet_hash, &maddr, &respond, &dupl_addr); > > > > if (dupl_addr) > > > > disc_dupl_alert(b, src, &maddr); > > > > if (!respond) > > > > diff --git a/net/tipc/msg.h b/net/tipc/msg.h index > > > > 0daa6f04ca81..a8d0f28094f2 > > > > 100644 > > > > --- a/net/tipc/msg.h > > > > +++ b/net/tipc/msg.h > > > > @@ -973,6 +973,16 @@ static inline void > > > > msg_set_grp_remitted(struct tipc_msg *m, u16 n) > > > > msg_set_bits(m, 9, 16, 0xffff, n); } > > > > > > > > +static inline void msg_set_peer_net_hash(struct tipc_msg *m, u32 n) { > > > > + msg_set_word(m, 9, n); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static inline u32 msg_peer_net_hash(struct tipc_msg *m) { > > > > + return msg_word(m, 9); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > /* Word 10 > > > > */ > > > > static inline u16 msg_grp_evt(struct tipc_msg *m) diff --git > > > > a/net/tipc/name_distr.c b/net/tipc/name_distr.c index > > > > 836e629e8f4a..5feaf3b67380 100644 > > > > --- a/net/tipc/name_distr.c > > > > +++ b/net/tipc/name_distr.c > > > > @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static void named_distribute(struct net *net, > > > > struct sk_buff_head *list, > > > > struct publication *publ; > > > > struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; > > > > struct distr_item *item = NULL; > > > > - u32 msg_dsz = ((tipc_node_get_mtu(net, dnode, 0) - > INT_H_SIZE) / > > > > + u32 msg_dsz = ((tipc_node_get_mtu(net, dnode, 0, false) - > > > > +INT_H_SIZE) / > > > > ITEM_SIZE) * ITEM_SIZE; > > > > u32 msg_rem = msg_dsz; > > > > > > > > diff --git a/net/tipc/node.c b/net/tipc/node.c index > > > > c8f6177dd5a2..9a4ffd647701 100644 > > > > --- a/net/tipc/node.c > > > > +++ b/net/tipc/node.c > > > > @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ > > > > #include "netlink.h" > > > > #include "trace.h" > > > > > > > > +#include <net/netns/hash.h> > > > > + > > > > #define INVALID_NODE_SIG 0x10000 > > > > #define NODE_CLEANUP_AFTER 300000 > > > > > > > > @@ -126,6 +128,7 @@ struct tipc_node { > > > > struct timer_list timer; > > > > struct rcu_head rcu; > > > > unsigned long delete_at; > > > > + struct net *pnet; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > /* Node FSM states and events: > > > > @@ -184,7 +187,7 @@ static struct tipc_link > > > > *node_active_link(struct tipc_node *n, int sel) > > > > return n->links[bearer_id].link; } > > > > > > > > -int tipc_node_get_mtu(struct net *net, u32 addr, u32 sel) > > > > +int tipc_node_get_mtu(struct net *net, u32 addr, u32 sel, bool > > > > +connected) > > > > { > > > > struct tipc_node *n; > > > > int bearer_id; > > > > @@ -194,6 +197,14 @@ int tipc_node_get_mtu(struct net *net, u32 > > > > addr, > > > > u32 > > > > sel) > > > > if (unlikely(!n)) > > > > return mtu; > > > > > > > > + /* Allow MAX_MSG_SIZE when building connection oriented > message > > > > + * if they are in the same core network > > > > + */ > > > > + if (n->pnet && connected) { > > > > + tipc_node_put(n); > > > > + return mtu; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > bearer_id = n->active_links[sel & 1]; > > > > if (likely(bearer_id != INVALID_BEARER_ID)) > > > > mtu = n->links[bearer_id].mtu; > > > > @@ -361,11 +372,14 @@ static void tipc_node_write_unlock(struct > > > > tipc_node *n) } > > > > > > > > static struct tipc_node *tipc_node_create(struct net *net, u32 addr, > > > > - u8 *peer_id, u16 capabilities) > > > > + u8 *peer_id, u16 capabilities, > > > > + u32 signature, u32 pnet_hash) > > > > { > > > > struct tipc_net *tn = net_generic(net, tipc_net_id); > > > > struct tipc_node *n, *temp_node; > > > > + struct tipc_net *tn_peer; > > > > struct tipc_link *l; > > > > + struct net *tmp; > > > > int bearer_id; > > > > int i; > > > > > > > > @@ -400,6 +414,23 @@ static struct tipc_node > > > > *tipc_node_create(struct net *net, u32 addr, > > > > memcpy(&n->peer_id, peer_id, 16); > > > > n->net = net; > > > > n->capabilities = capabilities; > > > > + n->pnet = NULL; > > > > + for_each_net_rcu(tmp) { > > > > + /* Integrity checking whether node exists in namespace > > > > or > not */ > > > > + if (net_hash_mix(tmp) != pnet_hash) > > > > + continue; > > > > + tn_peer = net_generic(tmp, tipc_net_id); > > > > + if (!tn_peer) > > > > + continue; > > > > + > > > > + if ((tn_peer->random & 0x7fff) != (signature & 0x7fff)) > > > > + continue; > > > > + > > > > + if (!memcmp(n->peer_id, tn_peer->node_id, > NODE_ID_LEN)) { > > > > + n->pnet = tmp; > > > > + break; > > > > + } > > > > + } > > > > kref_init(&n->kref); > > > > rwlock_init(&n->lock); > > > > INIT_HLIST_NODE(&n->hash); > > > > @@ -979,7 +1010,7 @@ u32 tipc_node_try_addr(struct net *net, u8 > > > > *id, > > > > u32 > > > > addr) > > > > > > > > void tipc_node_check_dest(struct net *net, u32 addr, > > > > u8 *peer_id, struct tipc_bearer *b, > > > > - u16 capabilities, u32 signature, > > > > + u16 capabilities, u32 signature, u32 > > > > pnet_hash, > > > > struct tipc_media_addr *maddr, > > > > bool *respond, bool *dupl_addr) { @@ -998,7 > > > > +1029,8 > > @@ void > > > > tipc_node_check_dest(struct net *net, u32 > > > addr, > > > > *dupl_addr = false; > > > > *respond = false; > > > > > > > > - n = tipc_node_create(net, addr, peer_id, capabilities); > > > > + n = tipc_node_create(net, addr, peer_id, capabilities, > > > > signature, > > > > + pnet_hash); > > > > if (!n) > > > > return; > > > > > > > > @@ -1424,6 +1456,49 @@ static int __tipc_nl_add_node(struct > > > > tipc_nl_msg *msg, struct tipc_node *node) > > > > return -EMSGSIZE; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static void tipc_lxc_xmit(struct net *pnet, struct sk_buff_head > > > > +*list) { > > > > + struct tipc_msg *hdr = buf_msg(skb_peek(list)); > > > > + struct sk_buff_head inputq; > > > > + > > > > + switch (msg_user(hdr)) { > > > > + case TIPC_LOW_IMPORTANCE: > > > > + case TIPC_MEDIUM_IMPORTANCE: > > > > + case TIPC_HIGH_IMPORTANCE: > > > > + case TIPC_CRITICAL_IMPORTANCE: > > > > + if (msg_connected(hdr) || msg_named(hdr)) { > > > > + spin_lock_init(&list->lock); > > > > + tipc_sk_rcv(pnet, list); > > > > + return; > > > > + } > > > > + if (msg_mcast(hdr)) { > > > > + skb_queue_head_init(&inputq); > > > > + tipc_sk_mcast_rcv(pnet, list, &inputq); > > > > + __skb_queue_purge(list); > > > > + skb_queue_purge(&inputq); > > > > + return; > > > > + } > > > > + return; > > > > + case MSG_FRAGMENTER: > > > > + if (tipc_msg_assemble(list)) { > > > > + skb_queue_head_init(&inputq); > > > > + tipc_sk_mcast_rcv(pnet, list, &inputq); > > > > + __skb_queue_purge(list); > > > > + skb_queue_purge(&inputq); > > > > + } > > > > + return; > > > > + case LINK_PROTOCOL: > > > > + case NAME_DISTRIBUTOR: > > > > + case GROUP_PROTOCOL: > > > > + case CONN_MANAGER: > > > > + case TUNNEL_PROTOCOL: > > > > + case BCAST_PROTOCOL: > > > > + return; > > > > + default: > > > > + return; > > > > + }; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > /** > > > > * tipc_node_xmit() is the general link level function for message > > > > sending > > > > * @net: the applicable net namespace @@ -1439,6 +1514,7 @@ int > > > > tipc_node_xmit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff_head *list, > > > > struct tipc_link_entry *le = NULL; > > > > struct tipc_node *n; > > > > struct sk_buff_head xmitq; > > > > + bool node_up = false; > > > > int bearer_id; > > > > int rc; > > > > > > > > @@ -1455,6 +1531,16 @@ int tipc_node_xmit(struct net *net, struct > > > > sk_buff_head *list, > > > > return -EHOSTUNREACH; > > > > } > > > > > > > > + node_up = node_is_up(n); > > > > + if (node_up && n->pnet && check_net(n->pnet)) { > > > > + /* xmit inner linux container */ > > > > + tipc_lxc_xmit(n->pnet, list); > > > > + if (likely(skb_queue_empty(list))) { > > > > + tipc_node_put(n); > > > > + return 0; > > > > + } > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > tipc_node_read_lock(n); > > > > bearer_id = n->active_links[selector & 1]; > > > > if (unlikely(bearer_id == INVALID_BEARER_ID)) { diff --git > > > > a/net/tipc/node.h b/net/tipc/node.h index > > > 291d0ecd4101..11eb95ce358b > > > > 100644 > > > > --- a/net/tipc/node.h > > > > +++ b/net/tipc/node.h > > > > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ u32 tipc_node_get_addr(struct tipc_node *node); > > > > u32 tipc_node_try_addr(struct net *net, u8 *id, u32 addr); void > > > > tipc_node_check_dest(struct net *net, u32 onode, u8 *peer_id128, > > > > struct tipc_bearer *bearer, > > > > - u16 capabilities, u32 signature, > > > > + u16 capabilities, u32 signature, u32 > > > > pnet_hash, > > > > struct tipc_media_addr *maddr, > > > > bool *respond, bool *dupl_addr); void > > > > tipc_node_delete_links(struct net *net, int bearer_id); @@ -92,7 > > > > +92,7 @@ void tipc_node_unsubscribe(struct net *net, struct > > > > list_head *subscr, > > > > u32 addr); void tipc_node_broadcast(struct net *net, struct > > > > sk_buff *skb); int tipc_node_add_conn(struct net *net, u32 dnode, > > > > u32 port, > > > > u32 peer_port); void tipc_node_remove_conn(struct net *net, u32 > > > > dnode, u32 port); -int tipc_node_get_mtu(struct net *net, u32 > > > > addr, > > > > u32 sel); > > > > +int tipc_node_get_mtu(struct net *net, u32 addr, u32 sel, bool > > > > +connected); > > > > bool tipc_node_is_up(struct net *net, u32 addr); > > > > u16 tipc_node_get_capabilities(struct net *net, u32 addr); int > > > > tipc_nl_node_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback > > > > *cb); diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c index > > > > 3b9f8cc328f5..fb24df03da6c 100644 > > > > --- a/net/tipc/socket.c > > > > +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c > > > > @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ static int tipc_send_group_msg(struct net > > > > *net, struct tipc_sock *tsk, > > > > > > > > /* Build message as chain of buffers */ > > > > __skb_queue_head_init(&pkts); > > > > - mtu = tipc_node_get_mtu(net, dnode, tsk->portid); > > > > + mtu = tipc_node_get_mtu(net, dnode, tsk->portid, false); > > > > rc = tipc_msg_build(hdr, m, 0, dlen, mtu, &pkts); > > > > if (unlikely(rc != dlen)) > > > > return rc; > > > > @@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ static int __tipc_sendmsg(struct socket > > > > *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t dlen) > > > > return rc; > > > > > > > > __skb_queue_head_init(&pkts); > > > > - mtu = tipc_node_get_mtu(net, dnode, tsk->portid); > > > > + mtu = tipc_node_get_mtu(net, dnode, tsk->portid, false); > > > > rc = tipc_msg_build(hdr, m, 0, dlen, mtu, &pkts); > > > > if (unlikely(rc != dlen)) > > > > return rc; > > > > @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ static void tipc_sk_finish_conn(struct > > > > tipc_sock *tsk, > > > > u32 peer_port, > > > > sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + CONN_PROBING_INTV); > > > > tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_ESTABLISHED); > > > > tipc_node_add_conn(net, peer_node, tsk->portid, peer_port); > > > > - tsk->max_pkt = tipc_node_get_mtu(net, peer_node, tsk- > >portid); > > > > + tsk->max_pkt = tipc_node_get_mtu(net, peer_node, tsk->portid, > > > > +true); > > > > tsk->peer_caps = tipc_node_get_capabilities(net, peer_node); > > > > __skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_write_queue); > > > > if (tsk->peer_caps & TIPC_BLOCK_FLOWCTL) > > > > -- > > > > 2.20.1 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next] tipc: improve throughput between nodes in netns
Jon Maloy via tipc-discussion Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:23:07 -0700
- [tipc-discussion] [net-next] tipc: improve t... Hoang Le
- Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next] tipc: ... Jon Maloy via tipc-discussion
- Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next] ti... Xue, Ying
- Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next... Jon Maloy via tipc-discussion
- Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-... Ying Xue
- Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next] tipc: ... Jon Maloy via tipc-discussion
- Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next] ti... Hoang Le
- Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-next... Jon Maloy via tipc-discussion
- Re: [tipc-discussion] [net-... Hoang Le
- [tipc-discussion] [net-next] tipc: impr... Hoang Le
