Rod Hetzel wrote: > My guess is that the differences between believers and nonbelievers are > much more complex than the above statements suggest. I would > also guess that you would find interesting results through within-group > analyses of believers and nonbelievers. (and) > I think that within-group differences are just as interesting, if not more > interesting, than between-group differences. Perhaps more harm has > been done throughout history by making the assumption that all > nonbelievers are alike and all believers are alike Paul Smith responded: >> Of course I'd be shocked if you weren't right about every word of this. >> I obviously could have prefaced my last post with "Warning: wild >> overgeneralizations follow"...but of course then we'd have to include that >> label on most of our comments. <grin> Haha! Can I say "Amen!" to that comment? And, actually, I have some articles at my office that explore some of the within-groups differences among those who profess a religious faith. I'll try to post some of these results to the list on Monday. But now, I have to get back to "COPS! Too Hot for Fox!" on the old idiot box. Now, is that a moral or immoral behavior.... Rod Hetzel
<<winmail.dat>>
--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
