> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Beth Benoit wrote:
> 
> > TIPSters,
> > One of my Intro students asked if a person who is color blind
> > has a better perception of movement - particularly peripheral
> > movement.  Since the rods take over for missing cones, and a
> > person who is color blind has fewer or no cones, could there
> > be a difference?
> > 
> > Here are her words:
> > 
> > "My husband who is color blind and doesn't really have good
> > vision  <snip>

I'm trying to decide in answering this whether Beth's student or Beth 
(or both) are using the term "color blind" in its non-technical or 
technically-correct sense. If the former, they may have in mind not 
true blindness but color deficiency (dichromaticity), probably of the 
red-green variety, which is the most common. But Beth's reference to 
"having no cones" suggests that she may be truly referring to 
complete color blindness ( monochromaticity or achromatopsia), which 
is rare.

My guess is that Beth's student used the term non-technically to 
describe her husband's dichromaticity, and Beth, being a techie,  
took this to mean achromatopsia.

If the problem is dichromaticity, I doubt there's an increase in 
rods. I believe that current theory is that in one of the two forms 
of red-green colour deficiency (deuteranopia), the cones of what 
should be the medium wavelength catching receptors are filled with 
the same photopigment as the long-wavelength receptors. In the other 
form (protanopia) the reverse happens. So I'd think that there 
wouldn't be a change in either the number of rods or cones. 

(OK,  I just checked. Kandel (Principles, 4th ed) says "...suggests 
that, rather than having lost large numbers of L or M cones, the 
dichromat possesses the normal number but all are L or M". And 
"suggests" means he's not really sure himself.)

As for true color-blindness (achromatopsia), it could be true that 
the loss of cones is compensated for by an increase in rods. But my 
best guess here is that it isn't: the number of rods is normal, but 
there's an absence of cones. Kandel doesn't mention achromatopsia at 
all.

Stephen
_____________________________________________________________
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.            tel:  (819) 822-9600 ext 2470
Department of Psychology         fax:  (819) 822-9661
Bishop's  University           e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennoxville, QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada

Dept web page at http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
TIPS discussion list for psychology teachers at
http://www.frostburg.edu/dept/psyc/southerly/tips       
_________________________________________________________ 


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to