Nancy Meluci > > This is a highly debatable statement. If it is true, > it can also be stated with some confidence that each > theory (Freud at least) has lead to some highly > unscientific and poor quality theory and > predictions. Such a glowing appraisal is not > warranted.
In my opinion, the bad does not negate the good. So, if a theory has stimulated research, both good and bad, it does not meand it hasn't done anything at all... > If we cannot adhere to scientific rigor in our > discipline, we may very well find ourselves out of > business. I agree we need to be scientific in our field... but it may be that we need to have the discussion as to what it meansto be scientific... as a field, that is! Cheers! Jean-Marc ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
