Aubyn writes: There are those who dispute the assumption that psychology should be a scientific study, and perhaps you want to make that case - I would be interested in hearing it. But what I have noticed (or think I have noticed) in your posts is a desire to have things both ways; to have psychology be both a scientific study *and* to have that scientific study somehow support possible divine or supernatural explanations. That strikes me as incoherent.
Jim Guinee: Well summarized. Color me incoherent! --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
