Re: Studying miracles

[Michael Scoles]

If we  start with a conceptual definition of "miracle" as an event that can not be explained as a result of natural processes, then operational definitions become impossible.  BTW, do we have a term for divine intervention with negative consequences?  Natural disasters that seem to select victims at random are often attributed to "God's will."  Stories of survival in such disasters are more likely to include references to "miracles.     Michael T. Scoles, Ph.D. Interim Chair, Dept. Psychology & Counseling University of Central Arkansas Conway, AR 72035 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/16/2004 11:01:58 AM >>> . . . with a carefully constructed study with clearly defined operational variables we can usually determine whether a result was the result of chance or divine intervention or whatever (with in 95% confidence).  That's the beauty of science.  We define our variables in such a way that they can be measured, construct a sound study and gather data. The problem with most people is they never define what is meant by a miracle or divine intervention.  --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]