Halpern & Hakel would clearly disagree with you. They are strongly interested 
in deep learning. Do a quick google!

Annette

Quoting Louis Schmier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Practice testing may improve test taking and test passing and test scores,
> and it reinforces that what's important is that which is on the test, it
> doesn't improve deep and sticky learning.
> 
> Make it a good day.
> 
>  
> 
> Louis
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Louis Schmier                            www.therandomthoughts.com
> Department of History                    www.halcyon.com/arborhts/louis.html
> Valdosta State University
> Valdosta, Georgia 31698                    /\  /\  /\          /\
> (229-333-5947)                            /^\\/  \/  \  /\/\__/\ \/\
>                                          /   \/   \___\/ /  \/ /\/  /\
>                                         //\/\/ /\  \__/_/_/\_\___\_/__\
>                                      /\"If you want to climb mountains,\ /\
>                                   _ /  \ don't practice on mole hills" -\__
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Scoles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 1:03 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
> Subject: Re: Testing improves learning
> 
> It isn't too surprising that repeated "practice" tests improve performance
> on the "real" test.  An obvious criticism of repeated practice tests would
> be that they may contribute little to general knowledge about the content
> area and more about specific knowledge of the test.  A thoughtful discussion
> of this problem can be found at:
> 
> http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/perspectives/perspectives2004.Apr.htm
> 
> 
> 
> Michael T. Scoles, Ph.D.
> Interim Chair, Dept. Psychology & Counseling
> University of Central Arkansas
> Conway, AR 72035
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/08/05 11:44 AM >>>
> 
> I'm wondering if any of you out there have read this literature and/or
> employed frequent and repeated testing in a class, and if so, how.  He
> spoke of someone (I've forgotten his name) at UNM who required a class
> to take three on-line practice exams before the real one and compared
> the results of that class to one for whom the three practice exams were
> offered rather than required.  (And we can be pretty sure they didn't
> take too much advantage of that.  Call my cynical again.)  The upshot of
> that informal (quasi) experiment was that the class for whom the
> practice was required scored about a letter grade higher than the other.
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Department of Psychology
University of San Diego 
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to