RE: Stats help

[Martin Bourgeois]

I'll second that praise, Dennis. I reviewed the first edition for Comtemporary Psychology, and I thought it was the best undergrad text out there, and I still feel that way.   Marty Bourgeois University of Wyoming From: Dennis Goff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 11/9/2005 8:56 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: RE: Stats help My students have been very happy with the Aron and Aron text which is mentioned prominently in the Guttmannova et. al. article that Miguel refers to. The new edition for 2006 continues to present conceptual rather than computational formulae and now includes description of procedures in SPSS for Windows. In my classes we start with the conceptual formulae and then move to SPSS analyses. I require that my students master both. I don’t have a lot of testimonials, but the few that I have indicate that students who learned stats under this system are very well prepared for their graduate courses in stats. In general they are well prepared to analyze their own data when they conduct independent research projects in our senior program.   Aron, A., Aron, E., & Coups, E. (2006). Statistics for Psychology, 4th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. http://vig.prenhall.com/catalog/academic/product/0,1144,0131931679,00.html   Good luck with the course Dennis   Dennis M. Goff Professor of Psychology Randolph-Macon Woman's College [EMAIL PROTECTED]   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 10:00 AM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: Re: Stats help   What follows doesn't quite address your question, but given that you and others on the list (including me!) have students do the work by hand, you might be interested in the following article appearing in the most recent issue of ToP:   Guttmannova, K., Shield, A. L., & Caruso, J. C. (2005).  Promoting conceptual understanding of statistics: Definitional versus computational formulas.  ToP, 32, 251-253.   The authors question the teaching of computational formulas given that instructional data analyses as well and actual analyses of data are mostly done with statistical programs.   Miguel   -- Miguel Roig, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Psychology Notre Dame Div., St. John's College St. John's University 300 Howard Avenue Staten Island, NY 10301 (718) 390-4513 Fax: (718) 442-3612 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://facpub.stjohns.edu/~roigm   -------------- Original message -------------- Hi everyone,   I've been offered a section of Intermediate Statistics at one of the CSUs. I have taught the intro course, including one-way ANOVA and simple regression, for about 8 years. I took a decently taught ANOVA course and very poorly taught course in Regression & Correlation in graduate school. Once upon a time I could do a two-level factorial ANOVA by hand.   So I am looking for a recommendation for a good text with sufficient practice problems (that's the way I teach. I will also want them to do work by hand before we use SPSS). CSU may have a book picked out (Howell is the one on my sample syllabus) but I'd like to know what alternatives exist. Also, for my own sake, as I intend to spend part of the winter break refreshing my skills in this area.   I learn/remember best by doing, so I really appreciate recommendations of books (and online sources for that matter) that provide actual practice problems. Thanks and good luck to everyone finishing the term.   Nancy Melucci Long Beach City College et alia --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]