On 2 May 2006 Jeff Nagelbush wrote:

>Here is an interesting article on repression by 
>a former professor of mine.
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Erdelyi-04022004/Referees/Erdelyi-04022004_preprint.pdf


The professor in question is Matthew Hugh Erldelyi. Some comments about an
assertion in the abstract:

"Also, substantive research since Bartlett demonstrates that memory is
reconstructive (elaborative). Bartlettian and Freudian reconstructions are
essentially the same, even in name, differing only in motive (cognitive
versus emotional)."

To say that "Bartlettian and Freudian reconstructions are essentially the
same" is erroneous. The claim about Freud's having anticipated Bartlett
has long been associated with the misleading (and inconsistent)
retrospective accounts that Freud gave of the 1895-1897 seduction theory
episode. Freud's patients at that time, the story goes, reported having
been sexually abused in early childhood. He came to realize, however, that
these reports were not authentic, and that they were patients' fantasies,
i.e., they had somehow reconstructed the stories on the basis of
non-abusive early childhood events.

In recent decades this story has been shown to be false by several
researchers who returned to Freud's original papers. The patients did not
report having been sexually abused in infancy, on the contrary, they
"assure[d] [Freud] emphatically of their unbelief" (Freud, 1896, SE 3, p.
204). For a brief account of this episode, see:
"Psychoanalytic Mythology"
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=10

For the purpose of examining Freud's theory of the construction of false
memories, however, let's take his later story as given, and examine how he
says such patients' "fantasies" arise. In "My views on the part played by
sexuality in the aetiology of the neuroses" he writes that these patients'
"phantasies (or imaginary memories)" are "mostly produced during the years
of puberty" (1905, SE 7, pp. 274-275). So Freud's theory is that there is
an infantile event (in this paper it was supposedly infantile
masturbation, later it was infantile Oedipal desires) the memory of which
is repressed around puberty, and "built out of and over the childhood
memories" comes the false memory, in this case (allegedly) of sexual
molestation.

Freud provides an essentially similar account of false memories of
childhood in his "Screen Memories" paper, in that the memories of early
childhood here are "formed" around puberty or a little later (1899, SE 3,
p. 322). Again, in the "Rat Man" case history he writes that "people's
'childhood' memories are only consolidated at a later period, usually at
the age of puberty" (1909, SE 10, p. 206 n.1). It is evident that, rather
than seeing inaccurate memories of childhood as the product of a gradual
reconstructive process over time, Freud asserted that they were formed at
a specific later date (generally around puberty) in the course of a
process of repression. (I leave aside here the general incoherence of
Freud's theory, e.g., he provides no indication of the psychological
mechanism of the process by which, say, repressed memories of infantile
masturbation lead to fantasies of sexual molestations. I also leave aside
that, contrary to the received story, these 'memories' were unconscious
and had to be analytically reconstructed by Freud himself.)

So it is erroneous to contend, as Erdelyi does, that "Bartlettian and
Freudian [memory] reconstructions are essentially the same". They are in
fact very different. As I note elsewhere, for a 19th-century view that
does anticipate modern ideas of the reconstructive processes involved in
memory we should rather turn to Frances Power Cobbe, who wrote in 1867
that "memory [is] a fingermark traced on shifting sand, ever exposed to
obliteration when left unrenewed; and if renewed, then modified, and made,
not the same, but a fresh and different mark."

Reference:
http://www.srmhp.org/0202/review-01.html

Allen Esterson
Former lecturer, Science Department
Southwark College, London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.esterson.org/

http://www.human-nature.com/esterson/index.html
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=10
http://www.srmhp.org/0202/review-01.html
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=182



---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to