TIPSfolk, Thanks for directing me to this article on academic freedom (thanks, Miguel). Generally, I like Stanley Fish's columns when they appear in the Chronicle of Higher Ed. However, I can't help but think that Fish's conservatism has now overtaken him.
Academic Freedom is exactly that--the ability to say and study whatever is desired without interference from outside sources. Taking an unpopular view is exactly in the sights of academic freedom. However, I don't think someone can discuss academic freedom without talking about political correctness at the same time. The question is: Are some subjects avoided because of the nature of the topic? Too few of us in academe have grown fearful of speaking out--mostly, I believe because pusillanimous administrators who will sacrifice one professor over public image. Recently, our campus invited the venerable David Horowitz to our tiny campus (Mr. Student Bill of Rights). The sparsely attended event did, however, make me think. Is it wrong to tell one side? Or, to give a minority view? To counter popular wisdom? You can read about this event in http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23357. It's sad to me that students lack the intellectual wherewithal to compose a counter argument. My 2 cents. Rob Weisskirch, MSW, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Human Development Department of Liberal Studies, Building 82C 100 Campus Center California State University, Monterey Bay Seaside, CA 93955-8001 (831) 582-5079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
