On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Rick Froman went:

all the textbooks I have used talk about HSD as a post hoc test that
is only appropriate to use after finding significance with an
ANOVA. Do you have something I could reference to support this?

I've heard that argument (that Tukey's HSD is a standalone test)
several times over the past ten years, and even though I haven't
generally abided by it, I think it may be correct.  Here's a cite:

Gregory R. Hancock and Alan J. Klockars.  The quest for alpha:
developments in Multiple Comparison Procedures in the quarter century
since Games (1971).  Review of Educational Research 66(3): 269-306,
1996.

I don't have a copy of it, but here's a post from one of the authors:

<http://www.math.yorku.ca/Who/Faculty/Monette/Ed-stat/0525.html>

--David Epstein
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to