One thing that is admirable about the journal _Psychological Science_ is
that the articles appear to be much shorter than other journals. In nearly
every issue are 2 or 3 special "Short Reports" that are 2 to 3 pages total.
And, single experiment studies are more common.

-- 
Paul Bernhardt
Frostburg State University
Frostburg, MD, USA
 


On 10/27/08 9:42 AM, "Jim Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> My brother-in-law is a well-respected orthopedic surgeon.  He once commented
> that his name ends up on publications of research largely (entirely?)
> conducted and written up by fellows who worked in his clinic at the time.  So
> his contribution is largely indirect, but that is sufficient in some fields to
> merit your name on a publication.
> 
> We also need to appreciate that in many sciences, papers are often of modest
> length and involve single studies (and much higher acceptance rates).
> Psychology has evolved (unfortunately I think) a tradition of lengthy,
> multi-study papers.  Those of us old enough will remember the contrast between
> the old J of Experimental Psychology or J of Verbal Learning Behavior (now J
> of Memory and Language) and current papers (longer, more extensive intros and
> discussions, replications, ...).  Perhaps psychology is thereby putting
> undesirable barriers and delays between findings and publication.
> 
> Take care
> Jim
> 
> James M. Clark
> Professor of Psychology
> 204-786-9757
> 204-774-4134 Fax
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> Department of Psychology
> University of Winnipeg
> Winnipeg, Manitoba
> R3B 2E9
> CANADA
> 
> 
>>>> "Mike Palij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 27-Oct-08 8:20 AM >>>
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:16:32 -0700, Christopher D. Green wrote:
>> Here's an opportunity to impress upon students the importance of not
>> publishing the same data twice (at least, not without being very
>> explicit that this is what one is doing).
> 
> This may give people new research opportunities as well as extending
> the review process of publications.  Consider the case of Charles
> Nemeroff M.D. who has been somewhat in the news lately.  According
> to a New York Times article, Nemeroff is author/co-author of over
> "850 research reports and reviews" (see:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/health/policy/04drug.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogi
> n 
> According to Nemeroff's biography page at Emory University, he
> was born in 1949 (see:
> http://www.psychiatry.emory.edu/NeuropsychopharmacologyLaboratory/Charles%20Ne
> meroff.htm 
> Being generous and allowing for Nemeroff to have have started publishing
> at 20 years of age, this leaves about 39 years of publishing for a somewhat
> astounding 21.80 publications per year or 1.8 publications per month.
> 
> It would be interesting to have answers to the following general
> questions based on a representative sample of researchers:
> 
> (1)  What is the median time to write a research article?
> 
> (2)  Does the median time to write a research article depend upon
> the number of authors? (Note:  are all contributing authors
> identified or are there "ghost writers" making contributions?)
> 
> (3)  What is the median time to publication for a report that is
> accepted (either completely or with revision) the first time it is
> submitted to a journal.
> 
> (4)  What is the median time to publication for a report that is
> accepted after being rejected by one or more journals.
> 
> (5)  Given the above time periods, how many articles could a
> productive researcher reasonably expect to publish during one's
> lifetime.
> 
> Given the other responsibilities that a researcher may have,
> especially a clinical researcher/practioner, one has to wonder
> how much time is spent teaching, being an administrator,
> seeing patients, actually conducting/supervising research,
> attending meetings, and so on.  I assume that some time is
> spent doing nonessential activities (e.g., eating, sleeping,
> etc.) but, given the volume of professional activity, one can
> assume that the time spent in such activities is negligible. ;-)
> 
> I am sure that we all could learn much by studying the habits
> of successful researchers.
> 
> -Mike Palij
> New York University
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
> ---
> To make changes to your subscription contact:
> 
> Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
> 
> ---
> To make changes to your subscription contact:
> 
> Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to