DeVolder Carol L wrote: > OK, I'll bite. Divergently speaking, why does it matter what you call it? > It's still the same construct. >
Au contraire, cher Carol! "Cognitive" was developed with the express intention of excluding those parts of "the mental" which were not subject to a certain kind of logical analysis (e.g., the ones that had caused so much trouble in the early part of the 20th century, such "consciousness.") Read my article: http://www.yorku.ca/christo/papers/cog-orig.htm (Of course, you're correct that most psychologists were never fully clued in to this critical distinction, and often used them synonymously). Chris Green York U. Toronto -- Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada 416-736-2100 ex. 66164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ ========================== --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
