OTOH, I would argue that some things are more available. For example, I have a much wider wealth of what used to be paper only in terms of journals and magazines and newspapers. I LOVE the electronic medium for its accessiblity and availability. At my institution we have fewer and fewer paper copies of anything in the library any longer and mostly just have e-texts.
I wonder if tips, which is in danger as Bill thinks about retiring, might not be better served by going to facebook, as a page that we could communicate through. The other advantage to that is we can put a picture and know what we all look like. Hah! That would be fun. Bill, have you considered that? It would mean that there would be no easily searched archive, but I bet as time goes by, this would become increasingly available. Alternatively, we'd all be responsible for our own memories about things and dowloading things that might be important. Hmmm. not sure that's a good option though. Annette Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego, CA 92110 619-260-4006 tay...@sandiego.edu ---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:51:10 -0400 >From: "Shapiro, Susan J" <sjsha...@indiana.edu> >Subject: RE: [tips] Change or Die: Scholarly E-Mail Lists, Once Vibrant, Fight >for Relevance >To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <tips@acsun.frostburg.edu> > >One of my early concerns about the internet was that information might be less >stable and accessible in the future than paper publications. >This finally seem to be happening. > >Suzi shapiro >sjsha...@iue.edu > >Please forgive the brevity. >Sent from my phone. > >--- >To make changes to your subscription contact: > >Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu) --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)
