Hi,

I was wondering if any fitness enthusiast or health psych tipsters might have 
had the same reaction to the new Time Magazine cover story that I did (I was 
motivated to write a letter, which is unlikely to be published but I thought 
I'd give it a go).? I was irritated by it for two reasons:

1) Scientific inaccuracy - the author mentions "converting fat into muscle". 
Isn't this just plain wrong? You can shrink your fat cells and build up your 
muscle cells but you can't "convert fat into muscle". The author (J. Cloud) 
doesn't seem to have any credentials (but he does selectively quote experts on 
weight and fitness.) This is an easy one and I wonder how he missed it.

2) A general tone of "why bother?" - Yes, the author mentions several times 
that exercise is crucial for good health BUT intersperses a lot of discouraging 
material - "if you exercise hard you'll just overeat to make it up later" OR 
"you'll just be lazier later." No, you don't have to do either of those things. 
It's like an excuse making festival...

I think the article is a great example of oversimplifying complex behaviors and 
how that can be misleading or destructive. Any credible fitness program 
includes encouragement to exercise and modify nutrition. I think this author is 
equating "exercise won't help you" with lack of discipline which of course IS a 
problem. I can see this article being used by countless people as one more 
excuse not to try to change at all.

Reactions? I am interested to see if I am off the mark here.

Nancy Melucci
Long Beach City College 
Long Beach CA

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)

Reply via email to