Is this, and other magic effects, just further evidence that applied, non-scientific practitioners acquire a "knowledge" of principles that science only later learns about and systematizes? Gary
Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Psychology Saginaw Valley State University University Center, MI 48710 989-964-4491 [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Riki Koenigsberg" <[email protected]> To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 12:33:06 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [tips] Copperfield trick All the cards are gone. He replaced them with other queens, kings, and jacks, but since you only paid attention to your own card, you didn't notice. This is another example of inattentional blindness. On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Britt, Michael < [email protected] > wrote: Does anyone know how this trick is done? Michael Britt [email protected] www.thepsychfiles.com Twitter: mbritt [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Now send it to some of your Friends, so they can have fun also. ! Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop. Learn more. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.427 / Virus Database: 270.14.111/2570 - Release Date: 12/17/09 08:30:00 = Vicky Kryoneris 516.921.3469 tel 516.521.0139 cell [email protected] = --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ( [email protected] ) --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([email protected]) --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([email protected])
