Deat Tipsters,

Here are some papers that are discussed in my research 
methods class. I give hints about what to focus on, although 
there is a set oc questions we usually ask. Some papers have 
weaknesses that students try to identify. 

The following information comes from the course handout.

Sincerely,

Stuart

Information from Course Handout

Discussions 

The purpose of class discussions (open exchange) is to critically
evaluate a number of research articles and published papers that
illustrate points of methodology and statistics and, hopefully,
provide some interesting data. Tethered with the writing up of
projects, reading the assigned articles exposes you first-hand to the
research process and will help you to understand the principles
presented in the texts and in lectures.

 When you prepare fordiscussions that are based on reports of 
scientific research (which means almost all), and whenever you 
encounter a research example, try to answer these 10 questions:

1. Which content area of psychology is represented?
2. What is the subject population?
3. What is the source of the problem? 
4. What is (are) the hypothesis (es)?
5. What type(s) of research method is (are) involved?
6. What are the operational definitions?
7. What are the independent, dependent and controlled extraneous
variables? 8. What techniques were used to control variables? 9. What
statistics were used? 10. Have you any criticisms (particularly of the
logic, method, data analysis or interpretation of results)?


Discussion 2 

CR8: Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences
of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58,
203-210.

Clearly understand the source of the research, derivation of
predictions and type of research method. Decide what the independent
and dependent variables are and how they are operationally defined.
Think about statistics. 

Discussion 3 

CR9: Carsello, C. J., & Creaser, J. W. (1978). Does Transcendental
Meditation affect grades? Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 644-645.

What is the source of the research? Hypotheses? How were the groups
formed? What is the type of research method? Think about statistics.

CR10. Rideout, B. E., Dougherty, S., & Wernert, L. (1998). Effect of
music on spatial performance: A test of generality. Perceptual and
Motor Skills, 86, 512-514.

Source of research? What were they conditions and why were they used?
What statistics were used and why? Implications of the findings?

Discussion 4

CR11: Nash, M. R., Drake, S. D., Wiley, S., & Khalsa, S. (1986).
Accuracy of recall of hypnotically age-regressed subjects. Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 95, 2948-300.

Think about source of the research, hypotheses, formation of groups,
statistics, interpretation of results.

Discussion 5

CR12: Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378. CR13: Milgram, S. (1964).
Group pressure and action against a person. Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology, 69, 137-143.

In CR12, concentrate on the area of psychology, type of research
method, operational definitions and procedure, and the precise result.
We might also consider ethics (see M3). In CR13, concentrate on type
of research method, procedure and results.

Discussion 6

CR14: Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in recall of
pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17-24. 

Source of research; type of research method; formation of groups;
procedure, interpretation of results. Again, note that F can be
thought of as t2.

Discussion 7

One of these will be discussed:

CR18: Mill, D., Gray, T., & Mandel, D. R. (1994). Influence of
research methods and statistics courses on everyday reasoning,
critical abilities, and belief in unsubstantiated phenomena. Canadian
Journal of Behavioral Science, 26, 246-258. 

What is the question asked? Is there a research hypothesis? What are
the independent and dependent variables? What kinds of control
conditions were employed? What statistics were used?

CR19. Wilson, T. D., DePaulo, B. M., Mook, D. G., & Klaaren, K. J.
(1993). Scientists' evaluations of research: The biasing effects of
the importance of the topic. Psychological Science, 4, 322-325.

Source of research? Who were the participants? Type of research method
and why? Procedure? What statistics were used? Implications?

CR15: Motley, M. T., & Camden, C. T. (1985). Nonlinguistic influences
on lexical selection: Evidence from double entendres. Communication
Monographs, 52, 124-135.

This paper is difficult in places. Here, I provide a summary of the
reasoning behind the research. Then you can concentrate on reading the
experimental procedures and results.. What do you think of the
findings?)

Brief synopsis of background for CR15:

Speech output is seen as generated by nodes in a network of words. The
node that is most highly activated will produce the output. Activation
occurs via association from other nodes in the network, which may be
stimulated (activated) in various ways. Associations may be based on
meaning (semantic) or sound (phonics). Motley's argument is that nodes
may also be activated by nonlinguistic associations, such as emotional
associations (e.g., anxiety, conflict). So, as he writes on p. 125,
"..Freudian slips - e.g., target "hospitality" - error "hostility" in
the context of anger" may occur. 

The purpose of this study is to examine word associations in the
presence of aroused emotion, in this case, sexual arousal. On p. 127,
Motley states a specific hypothesis for his first study.

Discussion 8

CR16: Page, S. (1977). Effects of the mental illness label in attempts
to obtain accommodation. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 9,
85-90.

Concentrate on source, type of research, statistics.

Discussion 9

CR17: Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without
pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.

Source, type of research, formation of groups, statistics, data
obtained.

Discussion 10

CR20: Silverman, L. H., Frank, S. G., & Dachinger, P. (1974). A
psychoanalytic interpretation of the effectiveness of systematic
desensitization: Experimental data bearing on the role of emerging
fantasies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 313-318.

Area of psychology, source of research, subject population, formation
of groups, type of research method and design; procedure; look
carefully at the statistics and the conclusion.




___________________________________________________
Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,                Phone: (819)822-9600
Department of Psychology,                 Extension 2402
Bishop's University,                      Fax: (819)822-9661
3 Route 108 East,
Lennoxville,                              e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quebec J1M 1Z7,
Canada.

Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
___________________________________________________

Reply via email to