----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Erwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 4:36 PM Subject: Re: Neural Representations of Trajectories > "Ron Blue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I assume you mean that a representation of an object moves in interacting > > neuro net? > > This would be similar to a oscillon moving in an interacting wavelet field > > with two standing reference frequencies. I have links to oscillons at my > > web site http://turn.to/ai . > > > > Ron Blue > Ron, you know where I'm coming from. I'm asking how an approximately 2D > neural network can be 4D topologically. > -- > Dr. Harry Erwin, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://world.std.com/~herwin > The 2D plus time is the model of an oscillon system. In the brain it would be three dimensional plus time. This suggest to me that there must be three or more reference standing frequencies with an informational overwrite on two or more of the reference standing frequencies. The informational overwrite is the data or representation. It has to be a holographic interference being generated or imagined as a moving position in the brain's neuro matrix. A type of moving high activity area which means the object or symbolic representation of an external reality. Relative to your reports, a fourth relationship exist. The time displacement of the object recorded in declining vectors around the present. You should be observing the middle of the data is the present. The old data positions is the past, and you should be seeing the estimated future. This should give you 4 plus dimensions. It also could be interpreted as support for a quantum model. Your report suggest the imagining area is a tube with a track history around the tube and probably a tract future. If this is true you should be able to observe that the strength declines as you move away from the middle of the track. One direction being the weighted history of the past and the other direction being the weighted estimate of the future. I would have thought that rather than be a continuous track the representation of the object would have modulated in out of existence like an oscillon with decline strengths. Just like an oscillon you should notice that as the calculations approach the end of the tube they start at the beginning as if out of nothing. Ron Blue http://turn.to/ai
