I wouldn't say the only problem with the claims of OEI is lack of peer review.
For one example, this cut and paste from the website is, to me, devoid of meaning: "In contrast, in OEI clients actually observe changes in cognitions, emotions, and physical sensations, depending on which eye they cover. In that way, they cannot discount the duality of experience, and discover that one of the “observations” is a distortion. This leads to “mentalizing” (standing back and reflecting on the disparate experiences from a higher-order self). For clients with a great deal of emotional lability, this is an entirely new experience." --Mike --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=5009 or send a blank email to leave-5009-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
