I believe some of you will be interested in the piece on Charles Dickens at this website:
http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-01-12/ I glanced only briefly before sending it on to tips but it seems quite in line with the type of critical evaluation that tipsters enjoy. Here is the preface to this piece from the editor: I ultimately decided not to publish this article in Skeptic magazine, and Mikhail was understandably upset about my decision. So I thought it might be instructive to publish it in eSkeptic with a feedback system in place whereby you, the reader, can judge for yourself whether or not you think that Mikhail Simkin’s scientific approach to literature in evaluating its quality and worth is a valid one. So, in addition to the usual comment forum at the end of (the online version<http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-01-12/>) of eSkeptic, we have also set up a quick polling system whereby you can register your vote on whether or not you agree with Mikhail’s scientific approach to assessing the value of literature. Annette Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D. Professor, Psychological Sciences University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego, CA 92110 tay...@sandiego.edu<mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu> --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=7862 or send a blank email to leave-7862-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
