Some subscribers to TIPS and TeachEdPsych might be interested in a 
recent post "Re: Economists and Value-Added Wave in Schools" [Hake 
(2011a)]. The abstract reads:

*******************************************
ABSTRACT: Economist Douglas Harris <http://bit.ly/eE72Vk>  (2011a) 
contrasts three recent reports on Value Added Measures (in decreasing 
enthusiasm for Value Added Measures):

(a) "The Economic Value of Higher Teacher Quality" [Hanushek (2010)] 
- 100% economist authorship;

(b) "Evaluating Teachers: The Important Role of Value-Added" 
[Glazerman et al. (2010)] - 60% economist authorship; and

(c) "Problems With The Use of Student Test Scores to Evaluate 
Teachers" [EPI (2010)] - 10% economist authorship.

Harris (2011a) wrote [my CAPS]:

". . . . there is a clear disagreement between these groups mirrored 
in the larger public debate. . . . . . why is there so much 
disagreement about what to do with these measures? The answer lies 
substantially in the backgrounds of the authors: THE HIGHER THE 
PROPORTION OF AUTHORS WHO ARE ECONOMISTS, THE MORE AGGRESSIVE THE 
REPORTS ARE ABOUT THE USE OF VALUE-ADDED [my CAPS] . . . . . . The 
divide between economists and others might be more productive if any 
of the reports provided specific recommendations. For example, 
creating better student assessments and combining value-added with 
classroom assessments are musts. . . . . . . . Another key step is 
experimenting with and carefully evaluating different options for 
using value-added. There is ALMOST no evidence to suggest that any 
use of value-added does or does not improve teaching and learning."

"ALMOST" but not quite. In "Academically 
Adrift"<http://bit.ly/gwJD0W> [Hake (2011b)] I wrote:

"Despite the naysayers and its apparent dismissal by a large segment 
of the evaluation community, formative pre/post testing. . . .[[a 
gauge of value added]]. . . . is gradually gaining a foothold in 
introductory astronomy, biology, chemistry, earth sciences, 
economics, engineering, math, and physics courses. At least for 
physics there is substantial evidence that pre/post testing has 
resulted in the improvement of teaching and learning in large 
enrollment courses at Harvard, North Carolina State University, MIT, 
University of Colorado, and California Polytechnic State University 
at San Luis Obispo.

But can multiple-choice tests gauge higher-level cognitive outcomes 
such as attaining an understanding of the abstract and 
counterintuitive Newtonian mechanics? Some psychometricians - see, 
e.g., <http://bit.ly/f6WFeg> - and most physicists -  see, e.g., 
<http://bit.ly/fDdJHm> -  think so, even though educator Marion Brady 
thinks not - see <http://wapo.st/g4LlDw>.
*******************************************

To access the complete 29 kB post please click on <http://bit.ly/gIg6Ae>.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands
President, PEdants for Definitive Academic References which Recognize the
       Invention of the Internet (PEDARRII)
<rrh...@earthlink.net>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi>
<http://HakesEdStuff.blogspot.com>
<http://iub.academia.edu/RichardHake>

"What we assess is what we value. We get what we assess,
       and if we don't assess it, we won't get it."
            Lauren Resnick [quoted by Grant Wiggins (1990)]
          

REFERENCES [URL's shortened by <http://bit.ly/> and accessed on 8 Feb 2011.]
Becker, J. 2011. "Economists and Value-Added Wave in Schools," online 
on the OPEN! Math-Teach archives at <http://bit.ly/eE72Vk>.  Post of 
6 Feb 6 1:07 PM (the Math Forum fails to indicate the time zone).

Hake, R.R. 2011a. "Re: Economists and Value-Added Wave in 
Schools,"online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at 
<http://bit.ly/gIg6Ae>. Post of 8 Feb 2011 14:59:24-0800 to AERA-L 
and Net-Gold.  The abstract and link to the complete post are being 
transmitted to various discussion lists are also online on my blog 
"Hake'sEdStuff" at  <http://bit.ly/gVC4mF> with a provision for 
comments.

Hake, R.R. 2011b. "Academically Adrift?" online on the OPEN! AERA-L 
archives at <http://bit.ly/gwJD0W>. Post of 29 Jan 2011 10:00:09-0800 
to AERA-L and Net-Gold.  The abstract and link to the complete post 
are being transmitted to various discussion lists are also online on 
my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at  <http://bit.ly/hVYzHI> with a provision 
for comments.

Harris, D.N. 2011a. "Economists and the Value-Added Wave in Schools: 
How Economists and Educators Can Find Common Ground," Education Week, 
26 January; online to subscribers at <http://bit.ly/hUipzZ> and also 
included in Becker (2011) in accord with "fair use" of copyrighted 
material - see e.g., <http://bit.ly/eNseEp>.

Wiggins, G. 1990. "The Truth May Make You Free, But the Test May Keep 
You Imprisoned: Toward Assessment Worthy of the Liberal Arts," AAHE 
Assessment Forum: 17-31; online at <http://bit.ly/a7g09T>.

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=8627
or send a blank email to 
leave-8627-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to