Jim Clark is correct: mathematically, there is nothing preventing a Cronbach's 
alpha or KR-20 (which is equivalent to alpha for dichotomous items) from being 
negative if the item intercorrelations are negative.  I've occasionally seen 
this in my own questionnaire data for just the reason Jim posits - when we had 
inadvertently forgotten to flip the coding of reverse-scored items (or more 
often, flipped them and then inadverently unflipped them  - a good reason, 
incidentally, to recode reverse-scored variables into new variables with little 
Rs after their labels).

...Scott


________________________________________
From: Jim Clark [j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 5:04 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] statistical oddity: please help

Hi

As shown below, the data in its original form has a negative average 
intercorrelation of items, hence a negative alpha (and KR20).  Is it possible 
that some of the items on your measure need to be reversed (i.e., they were 
negatively worded)?  The summary statistics show possible candidates for 
reversing.

Another possibility (less likely) is that rows and columns are reversed.  When 
I FLIPped the file (i.e., switched rows and columns), the intercorrelation (and 
alpha) become positive.  This could again reflect failure to reverse items 
(i.e., subjects responded similar to one another to pos and neg items).

You may need to convert following to fixed font (e.g., courier) to view 
properly.

Take care
Jim


data list free / Examinee A B C D E F G H I J.
begin data
1       1       1       0       1       1       0       1       0       1       0
2       1       0       0       0       0       1       0       0       0       
1
3       1       1       1       1       1       0       1       0       0       0
4       1       1       1       0       0       1       0       1       0       0
5       1       0       1       1       0       0       0       0       0       0
6       1       1       1       0       1       1       1       0       0       0
7       1       0       1       1       0       0       1       1       0       
1
8       1       1       1       0       1       1       0       0       1       0
9       1       1       0       1       1       1       0       1       0       0
10      1       1       1       1       1       0       0       0       1       0
end data.
reliab /vari = a to j / summ = all.


Reliability

Warnings

 No SCALE subcommand was found. Scaling will be done on
 all specified variables.

 Each of the following component variables has
 zero variance and is removed from the scale:
 A

 The determinant of the covariance matrix is zero
 or approximately zero. Statistics based on its
 inverse matrix cannot be computed and they are
 displayed as system missing values.


Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

                   N  %
 Cases Valid       10 100.0
       Excluded(a) 0  .0
       Total       10 100.0

a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
 Cronbach's      Cronbach's      N of Items
 Alpha(a)        Alpha Based on
                 Standardized
                 Items(a)
 -.447           -.544           9

a The value is negative due to a negative average covariance among items. This 
violates reliability model assumptions. You may want to check item codings.

Summary Item Statistics
                 Mean  Minimum Maximum Range Maximum /       Variance N of Items
                                             Minimum
 Item Means      .478  .200    .700    .500  3.500           .034     9
 Item Variances  .243  .178    .278    .100  1.563           .001     9
 Inter-Item      -.009 -.222   .200    .422  -.900           .006     9
 Covariances
 Inter-Item      -.041 -.816   .802    1.618 -.982           .107     9
 Correlations


Item-Total Statistics
   Scale Mean if   Scale Variance  Corrected       Squared         Cronbach's
   Item Deleted    if Item Deleted Item-Total      Multiple        Alpha if Item
                                   Correlation     Correlation     Deleted
 B 3.600000        .933            .429            .               -1.252(a)
 C 3.600000        1.600           -.218           .               -.254(a)
 D 3.700000        1.567           -.206           .               -.259(a)
 E 3.700000        .900            .408            .               -1.298(a)
 F 3.800000        1.956           -.452           .               .026
 G 3.900000        1.211           .078            .               -.671(a)
 H 4.000000        1.556           -.184           .               -.294(a)
 I 4.000000        1.333           .000            .               -.533(a)
 J 4.100000        2.100           -.582           .               .048

a The value is negative due to a negative average covariance among items. This 
violates reliability model assumptions. You may want to check item codings.


flip /newnames = examinee.

FLIP performed on 10 cases and 11 variables, creating 10 cases
and 11 variables.  The working file has been replaced.

Variable examinee has been used to name the new variables.  It has
not been transformed into a case.

A new variable has been created called CASE_LBL.  Its
contents are the old variable names.

New variable names:
CASE_LBL K_1.0000 K_2.0000 K_3.0000 K_4.0000 K_5.0000 K_6.0000 K_7.0000
K_8.0000 K_9.0000 K_10.000

list.
         K_1.00 K_2.00 K_3.00 K_4.00 K_5.00 K_6.00 K_7.00 K_8.00 K_9.00
CASE_LBL 00     00     00     00     00     00     00     00     00     K_10.000
A        1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000  1.0000
B        1.0000  .0000 1.0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000 1.0000  1.0000
C         .0000  .0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000  .0000  1.0000
D        1.0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000  1.0000
E        1.0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000 1.0000  1.0000
F         .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000 1.0000   .0000
G        1.0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000  .0000 1.0000 1.0000  .0000  .0000   .0000
H         .0000  .0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000 1.0000   .0000
I        1.0000  .0000  .0000  .0000  .0000  .0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000  1.0000
J         .0000 1.0000  .0000  .0000  .0000  .0000 1.0000  .0000  .0000   .0000

Number of cases read:  10    Number of cases listed:  10

reliab /vari = K_1.0000 to K_10.000 / summ = all.

Warnings

 No SCALE subcommand was found. Scaling will be done on
 all specified variables.

 The determinant of the covariance matrix is zero
 or approximately zero.  Statistics based on its
 inverse matrix cannot be computed and they are
 displayed as system missing values.


Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary

                   N  %
 Cases Valid       10 100.0
       Excluded(a) 0  .0
       Total       10 100.0

a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

 Cronbach's      Cronbach's      N of Items
 Alpha           Alpha Based on
                 Standardized
                 Items
 .610            .608            10


Summary Item Statistics
                 Mean Minimum Maximum Range Maximum /       Variance N of Items
                                            Minimum
 Item Means      .530 .300    .600    .300  2.000           .016     10
 Item Variances  .261 .233    .278    .044  1.190           .000     10
 Inter-Item      .035 -.178   .156    .333  -.875           .007     10
 Covariances
 Inter-Item      .134 -.667   .583    1.250 -.875           .096     10
 Correlations


Item-Total Statistics

          Scale Mean if   Scale Variance  Corrected       Squared         
Cronbach's
          Item Deleted    if Item Deleted Item-Total      Multiple        Alpha 
if Item
                                          Correlation     Correlation     
Deleted
 K_1.0000 4.700000        5.122           .171            .               .610
 K_2.0000 5.000000        5.778           -.096           .               .662
 K_3.0000 4.700000        4.233           .607            .               .502
 K_4.0000 4.800000        4.844           .287            .               .583
 K_5.0000 5.000000        4.444           .546            .               .523
 K_6.0000 4.700000        4.456           .489            .               .533
 K_7.0000 4.700000        6.011           -.193           .               .686
 K_8.0000 4.700000        4.678           .378            .               .561
 K_9.0000 4.700000        4.900           .272            .               .587
 K_10.000 4.700000        4.456           .489            .               .533



James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca

>>> Julie Osland <osla...@wju.edu> 04-Mar-12 2:36 PM >>>
Hi all--

In my tests and measurements course, we just covered reliability, including
different ways to compute reliability (test-retest, Cronbach's, KR-20, etc).
Part of their homework assignment was compute the KR-20 for a given set of
data. After giving the assignment, I performed all of the assigned
reliability.  In so doing, I arrived at a negative KR-20 value, which all
of my T & M books say should *not* happen.  I have double and triple
checked the math both by hand and via MS Exel and I get the same result.
When I collected the assignment, my students obtained the same outcome.
 Prior to the assignment, we worked two problems in class and nothing
'strange' happened.


I've attached as an excel file the KR 20 computational problem data, in
hopes someone would be willing to verify what we (my class and I) obtained.
If a negative value is possible for reliability, what does it mean or
communicate about the data?  I'm having difficulty wrapping my mind around
this right now.

Any help and/or insight would be greatly appreciated.  Feel free to e-mail
me off  list.

Thank you,

Julie


Dr. Julie A. Osland, M.A., Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Wheeling Jesuit University
316 Washington Avenue
Wheeling, WV 26003

Office: (304) 243-2329
e-mail: osla...@wju.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=16431
or send a blank email to 
leave-16431-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: slil...@emory.edu.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13509.d0999cebc8f4ed4eb54d5317367e9b2f&n=T&l=tips&o=16434
or send a blank email to 
leave-16434-13509.d0999cebc8f4ed4eb54d5317367e9...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

________________________________

This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=16435
or send a blank email to 
leave-16435-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to