Hi all, Chris Green sent a link to an example of a spurious correlation between rises in autism rates and sales of organic foods. I've rarely seen such high correlations in real-world data, so I felt compelled to check the reports to make sure the data used to calculate the correlation coefficient were accurate. It took a little time to find all the data used in the graph (the organic-food data were in several places online), but the correlation of 0.997 is correct!
Oddly, the organic-food data changed slightly between the 2009 and 2011 surveys (actually, the change first appeared in the 2010 survey data). Beginning in 2004, the amount increased slightly: 2009 Data 2011 Data 2002 8,635 8,635 2003 10,381 10,381 2004 11,902 12,002 2005 13,831 14,223 2006 16,718 17,221 2007 19,807 20,410 I didn't feel like searching through the summary reports to see if there was an explanation. The only effect on the correlation coefficient was to make it negligibly higher (0.998). Best, Jeff -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeffry Ricker, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology PSY 101 Website: http://sccpsy101.wordpress.com/ Knowing Ourselves: http://psysci.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scottsdale Community College 9000 E. Chaparral Road Scottsdale, AZ 85256-2626 Office: SB-123 Phone: (480) 423-6213 Fax: (480) 423-6298 --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=22629 or send a blank email to leave-22629-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu