Mike Palij writes: "it is not always clear what a Bayesian approach buys one though there may [be] situations when it is the method of choice." ------------------------- Well, it seems to help identify those studies that REALLY REALLY didn't replicate and those that REALLY REALLY did. To me, this is better than simply categorizing those that did vs. those that didn't based on significant NHST. Yes, in the end it remains a similarly dismal state of affairs but one might do some correlations of various factors with the calculated BF's to see what might be predictive of replicability.
Bill Scott --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=46496 or send a blank email to leave-46496-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
