I read (perhaps too hastily) ‘traditional medicine’ as being what is typically described as normal contemporary medical practices; not folk medicine. If you mean the latter, than yes, ‘oxymoron’ is correct.
On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Jim Clark <j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote: > Is it redundant or an oxymoron? > > Jim > > Jim Clark > Professor & Chair of Psychology > University of Winnipeg > 204-786-9757 > Room 4L41 (4th Floor Lockhart) > www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark > > From: Paul Brandon [mailto:pkbra...@hickorytech.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 9:13 AM > To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) > Subject: Re: [tips] More on Nobel prize and traditional medicine > > > > ‘Traditional medicine’ is redundant. > There is medicine (supported by science and consistent with scientific > principles) > and there is quackery. > Naturopathy is quackery, not medicine. > > On Oct 13, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Jim Clark <j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca> wrote: > > > Hi > > Science based medicine has a good piece on the nobel prize Michael P reviewed > nicely. Shows how it can be misinterpreted and abused by the naturopathy > industry, not surprisingly. > > https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/no-the-nobel-prize-does-not-validate-naturopathy-or-herbalism/ > > Take care > Jim Paul Brandon Emeritus Professor of Psychology Minnesota State University, Mankato pkbra...@hickorytech.net --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=47025 or send a blank email to leave-47025-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
