First, let me make something clear:  the NY Times Sunday
magazine has a column titled "Letter of Recommendation".

Second, when I first saw the title "Letter of Recommendation:
The Useless Machine" in a different context, I thought "that
must be about how most letters of reference are written by
people who have too little experience with a person to write
meaningfully about them (e.g., a professor who has a student
for only one lecture course)".

Third, when I read the article I realized that my first response
was wrong and that the article was more informative than I had
anticipated, covering such topics as transhumanism, Claude
Shannon, Marvin Minksy, and, of course, the infamous "Useless
Machine" that is an actual device (Minsky conceived it,
Shannon built it).  For more on these and additional topics
see:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/04/magazine/letter-of-recommendation-the-useless-machine.html

Fourth, back in the 1990s in the NYU Arts & Science psych
dept, the experimental program had little computer lab with
Sun Unix workstations and a public laser printer (faculty and
staff could send files to be printed either from the lab or the
computer in their office).  One day I had sent something to
be printed and went to the lab and it appeared that it had
printed my file in a very short amount of time (my office was
close by).  I picked up the putout which was facedown and
saw that it was a short letter of reference written for a recent
Ph.D. I knew by one of our more famous faculty members
(psroff allowed one to generate letterhead).  I probably shouldn't
have read it but because I knew both people and it was so
short, I did read it.  As a letter of reference for a job, it was
extremely short and, if memory serves, it essentially said
the following:

"X took a course or two with me and he did well in them".

That was it.  I thought it might have been a joke but on second
thought, given who had written it, they were probably completely
serious about it.  I didn't know if the person who asked for
the letter knew that this was the letter that would be sent to
the academic jobs he was applying for and wondered whether
I should say something to him. I decided not to.  The letter
notwithstanding, he got an academic position and I was happy
that he did (maybe the place didn't get this letter or did and
decided to drop it from consideration).  This is what I was
reminded of when I saw "Letter of Recommendation: The
Useless Machine" because that LoR really was useless,
no matter how well known the author might have been.

-Mike Palij
New York University
m...@nyu.edu


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=49359
or send a blank email to 
leave-49359-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to