On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 07:23:34 pm Nico Williams wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:07:31PM -0400, Dave Garrett wrote: > > This appears to just be a miscommunication. > > It is not. > > > The current poll is to remove anon ciphers in favor of raw public > > keys. We're not considering removing raw public keys, as far as I > > know, and I think most of us would be against that. > > Once more, with feeling. I would oppose the current proposal if there > was to be a follow-on proposal to remove raw public keys, which I > wouldn't have even though plausible but for Brian's intimating that he'd > be fine with removing raw public keys. Otherwise I would be neutral as > to removing anon ciphersuites. > > I would also be neutral as to removing raw public keys if anon > ciphersuites are to remain. > > Whichever one is removed, I shall oppose the removal of the other. > > I.e., these two features are interrelated. It is difficult to consider > the removal of one without considering the possible removal of the > other. > > I leave it at that.
Yes, I agree with this, and I'm saying that I think that we're all on the same page here. Brian made a point to explicitly not endorse raw keys, but looking back through the messages today, I don't see anyone actually propose removing them. Thus, I said this is likely to be a miscommunication. That's all. Dave _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
