Just to clarify, I think it is fine to define TLS 1.3 replacement for 
tls-unique using Exporters. But I suggest for interoperability this should be 
defined as a new channel binding with a new name, as opposed to just redefining 
tls-unique.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to