I support this code point assignment and we should also pull the same code points into RFC 4492-bis.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Adam Langley <a...@imperialviolet.org> wrote: > The IESG conflicts review for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-curves/ has now > completed without issue[1]. > > The editor's copy of the 1.3 spec contains code points for these > curves[2], specifically: > > // ECDH functions. > ecdh_x25519 (29), ecdh_x448 (30), > > // Signature curves. > eddsa_ed25519 (31), eddsa_ed448 (32), > > I'd like to request that these code points for early assignment. > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/MWmqSxBZxWPEt6glXJZvXg5lMS4 > [2] https://tlswg.github.io/tls13-spec/#rfc.section.6.3.2.2 > > > Cheers > > AGL > > -- > Adam Langley a...@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
