On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have to ask why the continued insistence on calling the thing that > forms part of the nonce an "IV". I find it to be misleading. > This is the historical terminology that TLS has used. > > Also, it might be worth noting that the string "early data key > expansion, server write " is never needed. > Yes, that's fair. -Ekr > > On 16 November 2015 at 17:25, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/346 > > > > As discussed in Seattle and Yokohama, I've broken out the traffic key > > generation > > into individual values. This makes life somewhat easier for those dealing > > the > > cryptographic modules, because some of this data needs to be public and > some > > of it needs to be secret. > > > > This general change already had consensus, so I plan to merge it on > > Wednesday > > modulo major objections. Please advise here or on Github if you find any > > errors > > or you violently object. > > > > -Ekr > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
