Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> writes: > Please respond if you have concern about early code point assignment for > the curves listed in draft-ietf-tls-curve25519-01 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-curve25519-01>.
The above draft, and rfc4492bis and tls13-11, has known issues/inconsistencies related to X25519/X448 that have been discussed on the list. When it was decided (offlist..) to move the content of draft-ietf-tls-curve25519 to other documents, I stopped working on it. What would the semantics of these code points related to the known issues be (e.g., code point validation or not)? Do the code points refer to what the draft above says, or what people appear to prefer (don't reject, but ignore set bit) and have been implementing? I can update the document to fix the known issues. The content has been copied to other documents that I have no editor influence of, so modifying draft-ietf-tls-curve25519 may make the situation even more confusing. Please advice if you want anything more to happen with the document above. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
