> On 12 Jan 2016, at 9:26 PM, Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > > The same concern still applies: what does it mean to allocate code > point for the 4492bis-05 description?
Allocating code points just means an implementation of draft-05 is likely to interoperate just fine with an implementation of the final RFC. Of course nothing is ever final until the RFC is out, so there’s always a risk involved, but it is considered prudent to allocate numbers when we’re reasonably certain of the calculations and on-the-wire formats. Any debate about whether we should or should not check certain inputs for certain conditions need not be a bar for allocating numbers. Yoav
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
