On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Dave Garrett <davemgarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 03:18:11 pm Eric Rescorla wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Bill Cox <waywardg...@google.com> > wrote: > > > I wish that were the plan (to upgrade QUIC crypto and eventually make > that > > > the new crypto platform). If I am not mistaken, QUICK crypto is going > to > > > be archived, TLS 1.3 will replace the crypto code, and QUIC will > remain the > > > transport layer. > > > > This is my understanding as well, based both onconversations with the > QUIC > > folks, and Adam and Jana's public presentations. A number of us (MT, I, > > Jana, Ian, AGL, Christian) have already started some initial > conversations > > at how to do that. > > I'm quite interested to hear what the plans are there. I'd appreciate it > if, whenever there is a fleshed-out starting point, an outline could be > posted to this list to keep us in the loop with what's going to be the > initial design. Not necessarily for debate here, but just so we can have an > idea of where things are going. > We definitely would post that somewhere, but thanks for the reminder to send a pointer to TLS WG. -Ekr > > > With that said, I don't think there's a plausible story in which QUIC > becomes the only > > transport protocol in the world any time soon, so I don't think > standalone TLS 1.3 > > is going away. > > Yes. Whatever the discussion for future work, TLS 1.3 is the current > direction. One step at a time so we don't trip over our feet. ;) > > > Dave >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
