> On 27 Jan 2016, at 5:51 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 4472bis has a TBD regarding a missing "E" in the name of ECDHE_anon > cipher suites. > > I raised an issue: https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/issues/17
Quoting: > My view: just because DH_anon is confused, doesn't mean we can't fix it for > ECDH(E). OTOH RFC 4492 has been around for a while. Renaming the label now could cause confusion. Another point to consider is that we’re deprecating all the fixed ECDH ciphersuites, so now all ECDH is ECDHE. So, I don’t know… Yoav _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
