On 4/4/16, 12:50, "Phil Lello" <p...@dunlop-lello.uk> wrote:

>
>
>On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Dan Harkins 
><dhark...@lounge.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>Isn't this use case more of an argument for an updated auth-digest to use 
>something better than MD5? I'm not convinced MITM is a real concern for a 
>typical IoT environment (however that's defined - I'm assuming http in a 
>domestic environment).

Like RFC 7616?

-Ben
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to