On May 12, 2016, at 10:40, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks Hannes.
> 
> This document was already approved by the IESG and we were
> just waiting on this particular change to be made. AFAIK,
> this change, while affecting the bits on the wire, is ok
> with those who care about this document so I don't propose
> to put it back through IETF LC or IESG approval unless
> someone really thinks that's needed.

For the record, this matches my thinking.

spt

> So I'll send the approval message in a day or two and get
> this sent to the RFC editor if nobody yells.
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> On 11/05/16 19:33, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>> Hi all
>> 
>> I have just posted an updated version of the TLS Cached Info document
>> reflecting the discussions from the last IETF meeting (and the feedback
>> received from Karthik before) regarding the size of the fingerprint. The
>> fingerprint is not truncated anymore, which reflects what we had in an
>> earlier version of the document.
>> 
>> Here is the document:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-cached-info-23
>> 
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to