On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 06:24:50 CEST Watson Ladd wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:49:03 CEST Kyle Rose wrote: > <snip> > > > I think that implementing complex binary cryptographic protocols is simply > > hard. > > And what conclusion should one draw about TLS 2.0 (*ahem* 1.3) as a > result of this realization?
we need what I'm already working on - a test suite (and a standard that makes it easy to know what is the expected behaviour for an implementation, in all cases) -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
