On 21 September 2016 at 17:21, Andreas Walz <andreas.w...@hs-offenburg.de> wrote: > Do you see any argument why ignoring such trailing data would be acceptable > (or even desirable)?
No. Well, we exploited that to add extensions to the protocol once, so I won't categorically rule it out, but in the case of supported_groups/supported_curves, no good can come of ignoring rubbish. Of course, it's hard to point to this being harmful as well :) _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls