On 11/18/16 2:18 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > In the end, it's just a label.
Well, there are some semantics to it - I think a label can be more than just a label. It occurred to me that it's guaranteed that if it's rebranded as TLS 4 we'll have people showing up with internet drafts proposing TLS 2 and 3, much like we've got occasional proposals for IPv5 (or other various versions). That said, I figure that's only a problem to the extent that calories are burned in response to these proposals, and what will matter is whether or not it's likely to lead systems administrators and those bringing up services to make bad configuration and deployment decisions. Melinda
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
