I feel we can go ahead with TLS 1.3. Or else TLS 3.4, because anyway we send 0x0304 on wire for TLS 1.3.
I hope all other three options (TLS 2.0, TLS 2 and TLS 4) will make confusion with SSL versions for end user. ________________________________ Raja Ashok VK 华为技术有限公司 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. [Company_logo] Phone: Fax: Mobile: Email: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Bangalore, India http://www.huawei.com ________________________________ 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁 止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中 的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！ This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! -----Original Message----- From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner Sent: 18 November 2016 07:43 To: <tls@ietf.org> Subject: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS* At IETF 97, the chairs lead a discussion to resolve whether the WG should rebrand TLS1.3 to something else. Slides can be found @ https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-tls-rebranding-aka-pr612-01.pdf. The consensus in the room was to leave it as is, i.e., TLS1.3, and to not rebrand it to TLS 2.0, TLS 2, or TLS 4. We need to confirm this decision on the list so please let the list know your top choice between: - Leave it TLS 1.3 - Rebrand TLS 2.0 - Rebrand TLS 2 - Rebrand TLS 4 by 2 December 2016. Thanks, J&S _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org<mailto:TLS@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
