I raised this before in PR #693 (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg21600.html).
I'm not sure it makes sense to rename this to legacy while other parts of the document still refer to it. But I'm definitely in favor of deprecating it. From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Dave Garrett <davemgarr...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 4:42 PM To: tls@ietf.org Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13-19 On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 02:23:33 am Kaduk, Ben wrote: > Should Alert.level be Alert.legacy_level? Yep. Trivial to fix, so quick PR filed for it. Dave _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_tls&d=DwICAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=l2j4BjkO0Lc3u4CH2z7jPw&m=ix39YzN5D9ZIP69oc6EpeIHky4mBDPr78L-0dRI3acY&s=wDljuAs_X9UuW_4VC-TwYR9TkDPrKiVZz7oRdOmL3aA&e= _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
