> On May 22, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:
>
> I strongly believe the text should stay as it is, for the most good to the
> most people. Viktor is in the weeds, arguably by himself.
Right, all by myself... With support from Nico, Ilari, and others who've
upthread
accepted that certificate verification is properly RFC5280 and not TLS, before I
suggested removal of the text in question (which solves no real problem, but
does
create needless interoperability issues for various TLS use-cases).
The dominant use case is not the only one that needs consideration,
and text that breaks other use-cases is NOT just fine, and the TLS
WG really does need to think more broadly than the Web PKI. This is
not the HTTPS working group.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
