Hi Willy, 2017-06-26 17:01 GMT+09:00 Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>: > Hi Kazuho, > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:03:24PM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote: >> One question: is the name `early-data` a good choice? >> >> The reason I raise the concern is because what the header suggest is >> if the endpoint has not yet seen a proof (i.e. ClientFinished). The >> name "early-data" might be confusing since it may seem to imply _when_ >> the request has been received rather than the current state of the >> connection. > > You mean that you'd prefer something indicating that there were unsafe > (ie not yet validated) early data in fact, that's it ?
Yes. That was my intention. > Willy -- Kazuho Oku _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
